09:00:04 #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting 09:00:04 Meeting started Thu Oct 3 09:00:04 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is szlin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:04 The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting' 09:00:15 #topic rollcall 09:00:17 hi 09:00:20 please say hi if you're around 09:00:22 hi 09:00:23 hi 09:00:41 hi 09:00:51 #topic AI review 09:01:02 1. Provide the cases to cip-testing to build up the test environment - Iwamatsu-san 09:01:03 hi 09:01:09 iwamatsu: are you around? 09:01:58 hi 09:02:03 it seems like Iwamatsu-san is not around, I will skip this topic 09:02:06 szlin He is not in our office, but probably working in another place 09:02:24 kazu: thank you for your information 09:02:29 2. Test LTS (pre)releases directly – patersonc 09:02:36 patersonc: are you around? 09:03:32 hi all. 09:03:35 3. Move cip-core repo to cip-project/cip-core - kazu 09:03:35 hi 09:03:42 hi 09:03:45 szlin done https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/cip-pkglist 09:03:45 iwamatsu: pave1: (wave 09:03:52 kazu: thank you very much 09:04:03 4. Review the proposal from Kudo-san - Kernel team 09:04:18 Pavel reviewed it. 09:04:48 For now, we are discussing with SoC vendor. Thanks to Jan's information. 09:04:59 masashi910: do you have any update on this AI? 09:05:25 hi 09:05:52 At this moment, I have no update from my side. I would like to know the next step. 09:06:01 Yep 09:06:05 Sorry I'm late. 09:06:12 patersonc: no worry :) 09:06:27 For my AI, I'm still waiting for feedback. 09:07:05 patersonc: Feedback on testing of stable -rc releases? 09:07:27 pave1: Yep. 09:07:34 Is the approach I'm going with suitable? 09:07:37 masashi910: next step is to wait for feedback with Xilinux, and we can start to merge codes afterward 09:07:54 patersonc: (they are discussing Xilinx now, lets wait). 09:08:25 pave1: ^ do you have any comments 09:09:01 szlin: Xilinx merge? 09:09:04 yes 09:09:34 szlin: Seems doable from my side. Next steps were outlined in the email.. 09:09:44 pave1: thanks, I will keep this AI 09:09:49 masashi910: is that ok for you? 09:10:00 szlin: Identifying what is really needed for basic system was on the list... 09:10:20 szlin: and moving neccessary parts from starging to kernel proper in the mainline would be good steps. 09:10:35 pave1: indeed. 09:10:36 The next step provided by Pavel-san is quite reasonable. 09:10:45 pave1: if your are OK, please add me to discuss xilinx (to CC)? 09:11:09 My question is if Xilinx does not respond, or does not cooperate with us, what happens. 09:11:27 pave1: if you are discussing by email. 09:11:50 iwamatsu: I thougth I'm copying cip-dev lists; that discussion was meant to be public. 09:12:33 pave1: Oh, OK. thanks. 09:12:38 masashi910: let's discuss after the meeting, let's check the AI first :) 09:12:53 since Iwamatsu-san is here, I will back to the AI which belongs him 09:12:56 1. Provide the cases to cip-testing to build up the test environment - Iwamatsu-san 09:12:57 Sure! Thanks. 09:13:30 iwamatsu: do you have any updates on this AI? 09:14:23 iwamatsu: are you around? 09:14:28 szlin: I have almost completed this work. Now testing. 09:14:39 iwamatsu_: thank you, I will keep this AI 09:14:40 2. Test LTS (pre)releases directly – patersonc 09:14:48 patersonc: do you have any update on this AI? 09:15:35 I'm just waiting to see if there is any more feedback before continuing with this 09:15:50 patersonc: I see, thank you. 09:15:53 #topic Kernel maintenance updates 09:16:01 Iwamatsu-san released 4.19.75-cip11 09:16:02 #info https://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/2019-September/003340.html 09:16:02 Pavel released 4.4.190-cip36-rt25 and 4.19.72-cip10-rt3 09:16:02 #info https://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/2019-October/003394.html 09:16:02 #info https://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/2019-October/003393.html 09:16:37 iwamatsu_: pave1: do you have any updates? 09:16:43 We need a better way to view results etc. 09:16:44 Probably best to use something like KernelCI 09:16:53 pave1: thanks for your work. 09:16:58 I reviewed 4.19.76... 09:17:16 szlin: I reviewed 4.4.168 09:17:30 iwamatsu_: pave1: thank you for your work 09:17:47 patersonc: +1 09:18:06 any other topics? 09:18:54 patersonc: that means we need to setup kernelCI 09:19:24 patersonc: it might related to testing, I will jump to next topic 09:19:25 3 09:19:26 2 09:19:27 1 09:19:34 #topic Kernel testing 09:19:36 szlin: Which I've already instructed LF to do. 09:20:16 patersonc: Big thanks for testing LTS prerelases directly. 09:20:25 The LAVA master had some issues yesterday where it wasn't processing jobs. 09:20:29 patersonc: thank you :D 09:20:42 I was debugging it last night. Still ongoing. 09:20:56 patersonc: I have not figured out how to tell which -rc is being tested, but I'm sure I'll find out eventually :-). 09:20:57 Have an issue where one of the jobs won't end, blocking the RZ/G1E board 09:21:08 So any CI runs will eventually time out 09:21:28 pave1: That's one of the issues. The only way to tell at the moment is to read the build log. Near the top the Kernel version is output. 09:21:48 patersonc: Aha, thanks, good to know. 09:22:17 In other news... 09:22:49 I'm working to improve the pipline structure of CI jobs. The changes mean that tests can run as soon as a build is done, rather than have to wait for all builds to complete 09:23:03 This should speed up the total time. 09:23:10 See https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/pipelines/86158976 for an example 09:23:39 That's probably it from me today. 09:23:49 Again, sorry for the issues with the LAVA master 09:23:56 I'll try and upgrade to the newest LAVA next week, hopefully that'll make it more stable 09:24:09 any other topics? 09:24:17 3 09:24:18 2 09:24:19 1 09:24:20 patersonc: That sounds like a good idea. It also means that we'll see "arm64 09:24:22 #topic CIP Core 09:24:41 patersonc: tests failed" and not "all tests failed" ... which looks better. 09:24:46 1. I've updated PDP (v2.1), I'll get the final confirmation in cip-members about this 09:24:52 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ce4G6cTIY3IGXESlJQfVZ9r-V0kOPkxKDocpb4Ob_AY/ 09:24:59 pave1: Agreed. 09:25:00 Discussions toward the package proposal in CIP security WG are now on-going 09:25:16 2. Regarding Debian 8 packages, Toshiba & Renesas shared the package list that they want to maintain longer term (in cip-members) 09:25:35 I'm agree that CIP Core keep maintenance of Tiny profile (deby) for Debian 8, but the problem is maintenance of source packages 09:25:51 Before we propose this info to CIP, it would be better to get cost estimation from Debian ELTS 09:26:07 3. Planning to hold a CIP Core WG meeting during ELCE, please reply in Doodle if you are interested in 09:26:30 No other update from me 09:26:39 kazu: thanks 09:26:42 any other topics? 09:26:48 3 09:26:50 2 09:26:50 1 09:26:53 #topic Software update 09:27:26 kazu: do you have any updates on this topic? 09:27:29 Sorry, I could not get the detailed info from Suzuki-san but, 09:27:36 [ON-GOING] Add some basic security features 09:27:47 This seems to be the current focus 09:27:59 kazu: thanks. 09:28:00 (from TSC minute) 09:28:05 any other topics? 09:28:06 3 09:28:07 2 09:28:08 1 09:28:16 #topic AOB 09:28:20 any other business? 09:28:40 3 09:28:41 2 09:28:42 1 09:28:50 #endmeeting