14:00:27 <fdegir> #startmeeting Cross Community CI 14:00:27 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Feb 7 14:00:27 2018 UTC. The chair is fdegir. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:27 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:27 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cross_community_ci' 14:00:47 <fdegir> so we are back with a brand new meeting! 14:00:53 <fdegir> #topic Rollcall 14:01:02 <electrocucaracha> # info Victor Morales 14:01:03 <fdegir> please log your name in if you are joining to the meeting 14:01:06 <david_Orange> #info David Blaisonneau 14:01:16 <hw_wutianwei> #info Tianwei Wu 14:01:24 <hwoarang> #info Markos Chandras 14:01:28 <mardim> #info Dimitrios Markou 14:01:51 <peri> #info Periyasamy Palanisamy 14:01:57 <fdegir> so let's start 14:02:03 <mbuil> #info Manuel Buil 14:02:07 <fdegir> #topic Functest Integration 14:02:15 <pkaralis> #info Panagiotis Karalis 14:02:26 <fdegir> #info The issue with volume attach/detach is still there even though there have been further fixes 14:02:42 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51695/ 14:03:07 <fdegir> #info We have been trying some more stuff and even hwoarang's magic didn't help so we might have to find a way to disable that test case 14:03:20 <fdegir> or we are stucck here... 14:03:46 <hwoarang> at least it's consistent 14:03:50 <fdegir> haha 14:03:51 <ttallgren> #info Tapio Tallgren 14:03:52 <hwoarang> same test case all the time 14:04:00 <mbuil> haha 14:04:10 <fdegir> nice to meet you Pollyanna 14:04:16 <fdegir> anyway 14:04:26 <fdegir> moving on since I really got bored and depressed with this 14:04:36 <mbuil> to be honest, attaching and detaching storage volumes is something which from NFV perspective might not be that widely use 14:05:02 <mbuil> it has nothing to do with networking which is our main focus 14:05:29 <hwoarang> true. functionaly it works fine. it's just a timing issue. when we check the volume status is not there, but it's there a few seconds later 14:05:39 <hwoarang> so i am not too worried 14:05:54 <fdegir> but as long as we have this issue there, we can't integrate functest to ci 14:05:58 <fdegir> or it will block all the patches 14:06:02 <hwoarang> yep 14:06:04 <mbuil> it is not that terrible if we disable it 14:06:17 <mbuil> fdegir: oh! that is bad! We need functest 14:06:20 <fdegir> but unfortunately i didn't get very straightforward answer to do that 14:06:31 <fdegir> we have to have functest suite builder 14:06:37 <fdegir> which makes things messy 14:06:46 <fdegir> it should be "hack" 14:06:59 <fdegir> let's move to another longrunning task 14:07:03 <fdegir> #topic Baremetal Status 14:07:11 <fdegir> david_Orange: mbuil: it is your turn to depress us :) 14:07:22 <david_Orange> fdegir, why depress :) 14:07:39 <david_Orange> fdegir, we start working on lf-pod4, on the centos 14:07:44 <fdegir> david_Orange: preparing everyone for the worse 14:08:05 <fdegir> #info The baremetal work started on lf-pod4 which the jumphost has Centos 14:08:17 <OPNFV-Gerrit-Bot> Markos Chandras proposed releng-xci: XCI k8s support centos distro https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/51607 14:08:24 <david_Orange> #info deploying on centos was never tried 14:08:55 <david_Orange> #info and it failed, due to the lack of support of NBD on centos 14:08:56 <fdegir> #chair david_Orange 14:08:56 <collabot`> Current chairs: david_Orange fdegir 14:09:24 <david_Orange> #info deploying on centos was never tried 14:09:27 <david_Orange> #info and it failed, due to the lack of support of NBD on centos 14:10:16 <fdegir> and you have a pod with ubuntu jumphost 14:10:17 <david_Orange> #info so i worked on a workaround to not use NBD, and i found something functionnal on ubuntu, so i will try soon the deploy on centos 14:10:19 <fdegir> no more excuses.. 14:11:13 <david_Orange> #info the depoyment result will be 5 nodes with a fresh ubuntu and a ssh connection 14:11:31 <mbuil> david_Orange: did you try already in the Ubuntu pod? 14:11:40 <david_Orange> #info we had the access on ericsson-pod2 this morning 14:12:04 <david_Orange> #info i am looking at the topology to work on the PDF/IDF 14:12:52 <david_Orange> but i have a few question to Dianfeng, because PDF, wiki and jumphost are not aligned 14:13:29 <david_Orange> mbuil, if you are available after the meeting we can work on that 2 pods 14:13:48 <david_Orange> fdegir, this is the end for baremetal 14:14:00 <david_Orange> (in my view) 14:14:01 <mbuil> david_Orange: I have to moderate the SFC weekly meeting, but after that I can help 14:14:05 <fdegir> thx david_Orange 14:14:12 <fdegir> and thx mbuil 14:14:20 <fdegir> moving on to the next topic 14:14:52 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: Congress/Blazar/Masakari 14:15:10 <fdegir> #info Congress got some more patches and the work is still going on 14:15:20 <fdegir> #info The status with the rest is same as last week 14:15:30 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: k8-nosdn-nofeature 14:15:42 <fdegir> #into k8-nosdn-nofeature on ubuntu got fixed last week 14:16:09 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: please tell us what you started working on 14:16:22 <hw_wutianwei> I have submitted a patch to make XCI k8s run on centos. 14:16:27 <hw_wutianwei> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51607/ 14:16:45 <fdegir> #info Patch to introduce support for centos is under review ^ 14:16:49 <hw_wutianwei> #info it seem that biforst has some issue in verification 14:17:37 <hw_wutianwei> besides, I am trying to access k8s dashboard UI from outside. The UI can only be accessed within the cluster now. 14:17:40 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: yes, bifrost master got broken due to removal of policy.json from ironic 14:17:56 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: we moved to latest version of bifrost and things should be normal now 14:18:08 <fdegir> everyone should rebase their work to get rid of the problem 14:18:19 <hw_wutianwei> and add information for users about how to get started. 14:18:31 <hwoarang> hw_wutianwei: i rebased the patch to test with new bifrost 14:18:49 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: thanks 14:18:57 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: can you perhaps update http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/submodules/releng-xci/docs/xci-user-guide.html ? 14:19:05 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: it is openstack oriented at the moment 14:19:35 <hw_wutianwei> fdegir: Ok, I will 14:19:50 <fdegir> you can add a new section to talk about kubespray and move the existing sandbox introductions under new section named osa or something 14:20:36 <fdegir> thx hw_wutianwei if that's all 14:20:42 <hw_wutianwei> yep 14:20:47 <mbuil> is there any k8s scenario in OPNFV apart from nosdn-nofeature? 14:20:59 <fdegir> hwoarang: you also started working on k8s stuff 14:21:16 <fdegir> mbuil: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Fraser+Scenario+Status 14:21:19 <hwoarang> yes opensuse on kubespray 14:21:26 <hwoarang> WIP 14:21:41 <fdegir> #info Work to introduce support for openSUSE started 14:21:55 <fdegir> thx hwoarang 14:22:34 <fdegir> #info I reached out to few Google guys from kubernetes community regarding the tooling they use and I've been told to send mail to test-sig and k8s-users mailing list 14:22:52 <fdegir> will keep you informed if I get a(ny) response 14:23:22 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-sfc 14:23:27 <fdegir> mbuil: mardim: any updates? 14:24:03 <mbuil> #info Our instructions to deploy Pike were updated (to fix the ironic issue) ==> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/sfc/Deploy+OPNFV+SFC+scenarios 14:24:51 <fdegir> mbuil: about osa shabump? 14:25:09 <fdegir> mbuil: are there any serious fixes you are expecting? 14:25:26 <mbuil> #info mardim and I are looking into the CI/CD pipeline of ODL. We would like to be able to test different versions of ODL as we do with OpenStack. mardim is becoming the maintainer of the .deb package and I am trying to create the pipeline for opensuse 14:26:12 <mbuil> fdegir: yes, a lot :) 14:26:18 <fdegir> mbuil: ok 14:26:29 <mbuil> There is a tacker patch which was submitted today 14:26:38 <fdegir> mbuil: we will turn our focus to hacking functest and disabling the failing testcase 14:27:01 <fdegir> mbuil: and try to bump sha asap 14:27:26 <hwoarang> there are some galera fixes that we need too 14:27:35 <fdegir> and about mardim maintaining deb and you creating opensuse pipeline 14:27:37 <hwoarang> upstream made changes in mirror dir layout and broke stuff 14:27:44 <fdegir> both are great news so thank you a lot 14:27:54 <fdegir> i am sure there are other people who need them 14:28:27 <fdegir> is that all for sfc mbuil? 14:28:30 <mbuil> fdegir: ideally, we will need a second bump to move openstack to February to consume tacker changes and odl-ansible changes. But we could create a a-r-r in the OPNFV-SFC repo until we reach those SHAs 14:28:36 <mardim> fdegir, Sorry I was late 14:28:51 <fdegir> mbuil: once we have functest, the thing could be automated and making things faster 14:28:54 <mardim> so I create some an ODL nitrogen SR1 package 14:28:59 <mardim> for ubuntu 14:29:04 <mardim> to my private PPA 14:29:17 <mardim> adn when It is tested and works 14:29:21 <fdegir> we should move to official queens ocne it's released around the end of february 14:29:32 <mardim> I will upload it to the official ODL-team PPa 14:29:41 <mardim> thso are the updates I have related to XCI 14:29:42 <fdegir> mardim: +1 14:29:54 <mardim> sorry for the delay ! 14:30:04 <fdegir> mardim: no problem at all 14:30:17 <mbuil> regarding the ODL pipeline, we might create some sort of blueprint to discuss how to do it 14:30:33 <mardim> le tme send you the link for my PPA : https://launchpad.net/~mardim/+archive/ubuntu/odl-nitrogen 14:30:37 <mbuil> because ODL needs to be built, etc... so there are things that change compared to openstack 14:30:44 <mardim> if anyone wants to test it be my guest :) 14:31:02 <fdegir> mbuil: I think you can continue the thread and put your ideas there 14:31:29 <mbuil> ok 14:31:30 <fdegir> mbuil: I'm not sure if odl has something like blueprint or you propose patches to odl releng and gather feedback 14:31:45 <fdegir> let's move 14:31:55 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-bgpvpn 14:32:00 <fdegir> peri: hello 14:32:06 <peri> I have got latest ODL nitrogen deb package from mardim and started testing BGPVPN control plane with it 14:32:18 <fdegir> #info peri got latest ODL nitrogen deb package from mardim and started testing BGPVPN control plane with it 14:32:23 <mardim> peri it is installed succesfully and started ? 14:32:39 <peri> yes, i see it installed and configured bgpvpn server 14:32:48 <mardim> thanks god !! 14:32:50 <mardim> :) 14:33:04 <peri> but i am yet to start remaining tests. will update you :) 14:33:10 <mardim> ok 14:33:18 <peri> we also found an issue with OVS 2.8.0 for L3 packet handling in the data path. The fix got merged into OVS 2.8 branch yesterday. will need to pull the OVS release with this fix 14:33:45 <fdegir> #info an issue has been found with OVS 2.8.0 for L3 packet handling in the data path. The fix got merged into OVS 2.8 branch yesterday. will need to pull the OVS release with this fix 14:34:25 <peri> how do we do that in os neutron role ? 14:34:42 <peri> right now we can install it only from source 14:35:29 <peri> i.e. from https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/tree/branch-2.8 14:36:31 <mbuil> peri: as far as I know, in sfc we are installing it from a repo 14:37:02 <peri> yes mbuil, i think we can discuss offline later about how it can be done 14:37:11 <fdegir> good 14:37:14 <fdegir> anything else peri? 14:37:17 <peri> The upstrean review is still pending for so long time: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523907/. please do it. 14:37:45 <fdegir> #info Patches are waiting for review for quite some time. Everyone is welcomed to review them. 14:37:47 <peri> Not able to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522598/ due to gate failures at neutron role. the gate job is consistently failing due to other issues 14:37:55 <fdegir> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523907/ 14:38:31 <fdegir> hwoarang: I'm not sure if you have time but if you do, you know what to do :/ ^ 14:38:44 <fdegir> #info Failures in gate is also slowing down the progress 14:38:52 <fdegir> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522598/ 14:39:02 <hwoarang> right resolving the merge would be a good start :) 14:39:08 <fdegir> hehe 14:39:19 <peri> i have been trying to push /c/522598 for long time without a success 14:39:35 <hwoarang> sorry about that will push for it from now on 14:40:00 <peri> its simply demotivating :( 14:40:18 <fdegir> peri: I think it is important to get zuul +1 and fixing merge conflicts so people know something passed basic tests and ready for review 14:40:32 <fdegir> peri: I know zuul is a bit shaky lately but we have to keep trying 14:40:56 <mbuil> peri: my experience is that if you don't get a +1 from Zuul, OSA people think you are still working on it and don't require a review 14:41:05 <hwoarang> that's about right 14:41:12 <fdegir> tbh, it is probably same with many projects 14:41:15 <hwoarang> it's very low in the dashboard 14:41:20 <hwoarang> in the OSA dashboard 14:41:28 <hwoarang> all zuul -1 reviews 14:41:47 <peri> but failure for c/523907 is due to different reason. this is what i saw it in the logs 14:41:56 <peri> so couldn't do much about it 14:42:21 <hwoarang> peri: if it's for different reasons we normally fix these so you need to recheck and rebase 14:42:29 <hwoarang> at least right now the integration repo has zuul + 1 14:42:40 <hwoarang> :( 14:42:47 <fdegir> peri: anything else you want to add? 14:43:04 <peri> thats it :) 14:43:49 <fdegir> thanks peri 14:43:56 <fdegir> #topic Centos Issues 14:44:13 <fdegir> #info Centos started failing and voting is disabled for them 14:44:23 <fdegir> ttallgren: did you have chance to look at it? 14:45:03 <ttallgren> Yes, I started doing that but nothing to report yet 14:45:15 <fdegir> thanks for looking into it! 14:45:20 <fdegir> #topic Documentation Updates 14:45:44 <fdegir> #info ttallgren added xci-dev-guide during opnfv doc hacfest last week 14:45:48 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51445/ 14:46:17 <fdegir> #info Please review so we can have a good dev guide, helping others who might need the info for the work they intend to bring in 14:46:32 <fdegir> and thanks ttallgren for getting the work started 14:46:40 <ttallgren> No problem 14:47:06 <fdegir> #topic What about Kolla? 14:47:11 <fdegir> electrocucaracha: david_Orange: ^ 14:47:35 <david_Orange> i had no time to work on it 14:47:51 <electrocucaracha> I rebased the WIP patch https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/47995/ 14:47:54 <fdegir> david_Orange: I know, just wanted to continue making fun 14:48:00 <fdegir> electrocucaracha: thanks for that 14:48:12 <fdegir> electrocucaracha: but can we get some input please before sending more patches? 14:48:53 <electrocucaracha> fdegir: what kind of input? 14:49:06 <fdegir> like the one I asked last week and the week before 14:49:15 <fdegir> the reasons, benefits, differences 14:49:19 <electrocucaracha> fdegir: ohh that one 14:49:24 <fdegir> like brief overview about what kolla brings in 14:49:27 <fdegir> because 14:49:47 <fdegir> we have some more people interested in xci and we need to set a precedence/way of working 14:49:51 <fdegir> which is the next topic 14:50:11 <fdegir> let's switch topic and I'll ask this again next week 14:50:19 <fdegir> #topic OpenStack Helm in XCI 14:50:20 <electrocucaracha> sure, besides the etherpad link where it was made some important discussions right? 14:51:00 <fdegir> #info I've been introduced to OSH PTL and he was interested to learn more about XCI and possibility to collaborate 14:51:58 <fdegir> #info I'll ask him the same things I've been asking about Kolla; what kind of use cases OSH can help with, what are the differences and let the team decide 14:53:23 <fdegir> we can talk about this more and have conversation directly with PTL during one of the meetings so you know what it is and ask questions 14:53:36 <fdegir> #topic XCI Committer Promotions 14:54:04 <fdegir> #info as you know, TSC approved committer list per subrepo and it is time for us to get the process started 14:54:34 <fdegir> #info We are working on this and things should start happening soon 14:55:27 <fdegir> #info This will be accompanies with an improved way of working like putting some more effort in reviewing stuff and requiring 2 +2s for patches to be merged so we keep things in good shape 14:55:48 <fdegir> #info Committer list will frequently be reviewed 14:56:08 <fdegir> any questions, ping me please 14:56:14 <fdegir> #topic AOB 14:56:19 <fdegir> anyone wants to bring anything? 14:56:59 <electrocucaracha> hwoarang: I modify the proxy patch with the use of a galaxy role, can you take a look later? 14:57:33 <fdegir> #info breaking news: the patch to disable snaps volume test is under review 14:57:34 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51849/ 14:57:50 <fdegir> thank you all and talk to you next week! 14:57:57 <fdegir> keep up the great work 14:57:59 <david_Orange> fdegir, it may be out of meeting, but if we an have a talk about xci "not an installer" in the code it could be a good thing 14:58:00 <fdegir> #endmeeting