14:00:27 <fdegir> #startmeeting Cross Community CI
14:00:27 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Feb  7 14:00:27 2018 UTC.  The chair is fdegir. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:27 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:00:27 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cross_community_ci'
14:00:47 <fdegir> so we are back with a brand new meeting!
14:00:53 <fdegir> #topic Rollcall
14:01:02 <electrocucaracha> # info Victor Morales
14:01:03 <fdegir> please log your name in if you are joining to the meeting
14:01:06 <david_Orange> #info David Blaisonneau
14:01:16 <hw_wutianwei> #info Tianwei Wu
14:01:24 <hwoarang> #info Markos Chandras
14:01:28 <mardim> #info Dimitrios Markou
14:01:51 <peri> #info Periyasamy Palanisamy
14:01:57 <fdegir> so let's start
14:02:03 <mbuil> #info Manuel Buil
14:02:07 <fdegir> #topic Functest Integration
14:02:15 <pkaralis> #info Panagiotis Karalis
14:02:26 <fdegir> #info The issue with volume attach/detach is still there even though there have been further fixes
14:02:42 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51695/
14:03:07 <fdegir> #info We have been trying some more stuff and even hwoarang's magic didn't help so we might have to find a way to disable that test case
14:03:20 <fdegir> or we are stucck here...
14:03:46 <hwoarang> at least it's consistent
14:03:50 <fdegir> haha
14:03:51 <ttallgren> #info Tapio Tallgren
14:03:52 <hwoarang> same test case all the time
14:04:00 <mbuil> haha
14:04:10 <fdegir> nice to meet you Pollyanna
14:04:16 <fdegir> anyway
14:04:26 <fdegir> moving on since I really got bored and depressed with this
14:04:36 <mbuil> to be honest, attaching and detaching storage volumes is something which from NFV perspective might not be that widely use
14:05:02 <mbuil> it has nothing to do with networking which is our main focus
14:05:29 <hwoarang> true. functionaly it works fine. it's just a timing issue. when we check the volume status is not there, but it's there a few seconds later
14:05:39 <hwoarang> so i am not too worried
14:05:54 <fdegir> but as long as we have this issue there, we can't integrate functest to ci
14:05:58 <fdegir> or it will block all the patches
14:06:02 <hwoarang> yep
14:06:04 <mbuil> it is not that terrible if we disable it
14:06:17 <mbuil> fdegir: oh! that is bad! We need functest
14:06:20 <fdegir> but unfortunately i didn't get very straightforward answer to do that
14:06:31 <fdegir> we have to have functest suite builder
14:06:37 <fdegir> which makes things messy
14:06:46 <fdegir> it should be "hack"
14:06:59 <fdegir> let's move to another longrunning task
14:07:03 <fdegir> #topic Baremetal Status
14:07:11 <fdegir> david_Orange: mbuil: it is your turn to depress us :)
14:07:22 <david_Orange> fdegir, why depress :)
14:07:39 <david_Orange> fdegir, we start working on lf-pod4, on the centos
14:07:44 <fdegir> david_Orange: preparing everyone for the worse
14:08:05 <fdegir> #info The baremetal work started on lf-pod4 which the jumphost has Centos
14:08:17 <OPNFV-Gerrit-Bot> Markos Chandras proposed releng-xci: XCI k8s support centos distro  https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/51607
14:08:24 <david_Orange> #info deploying on centos was never tried
14:08:55 <david_Orange> #info and it failed, due to the lack of support of NBD on centos
14:08:56 <fdegir> #chair david_Orange
14:08:56 <collabot`> Current chairs: david_Orange fdegir
14:09:24 <david_Orange> #info deploying on centos was never tried
14:09:27 <david_Orange> #info and it failed, due to the lack of support of NBD on centos
14:10:16 <fdegir> and you have a pod with ubuntu jumphost
14:10:17 <david_Orange> #info so i worked on a workaround to not use NBD, and i found something functionnal on ubuntu, so i will try soon the deploy on centos
14:10:19 <fdegir> no more excuses..
14:11:13 <david_Orange> #info the depoyment result will be 5 nodes with a fresh ubuntu and a ssh connection
14:11:31 <mbuil> david_Orange: did you try already in the Ubuntu pod?
14:11:40 <david_Orange> #info we had the access on ericsson-pod2 this morning
14:12:04 <david_Orange> #info i am looking at the topology to work on the PDF/IDF
14:12:52 <david_Orange> but i have a few question to  Dianfeng, because PDF, wiki and jumphost are not aligned
14:13:29 <david_Orange> mbuil, if you are available after the meeting we can work on that 2 pods
14:13:48 <david_Orange> fdegir, this is the end for baremetal
14:14:00 <david_Orange> (in my view)
14:14:01 <mbuil> david_Orange: I have to moderate the SFC weekly meeting, but after that I can help
14:14:05 <fdegir> thx david_Orange
14:14:12 <fdegir> and thx mbuil
14:14:20 <fdegir> moving on to the next topic
14:14:52 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: Congress/Blazar/Masakari
14:15:10 <fdegir> #info Congress got some more patches and the work is still going on
14:15:20 <fdegir> #info The status with the rest is same as last week
14:15:30 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: k8-nosdn-nofeature
14:15:42 <fdegir> #into k8-nosdn-nofeature on ubuntu got fixed last week
14:16:09 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: please tell us what you started working on
14:16:22 <hw_wutianwei> I have submitted a patch to make XCI k8s run on centos.
14:16:27 <hw_wutianwei> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51607/
14:16:45 <fdegir> #info Patch to introduce support for centos is under review ^
14:16:49 <hw_wutianwei> #info it seem that biforst has some issue in verification
14:17:37 <hw_wutianwei> besides, I am trying to access k8s dashboard UI from outside. The UI can only be accessed within the cluster now.
14:17:40 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: yes, bifrost master got broken due to removal of policy.json from ironic
14:17:56 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: we moved to latest version of bifrost and things should be normal now
14:18:08 <fdegir> everyone should rebase their work to get rid of the problem
14:18:19 <hw_wutianwei> and add information for users about how to get started.
14:18:31 <hwoarang> hw_wutianwei: i rebased the patch to test with new bifrost
14:18:49 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang:  thanks
14:18:57 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: can you perhaps update http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/submodules/releng-xci/docs/xci-user-guide.html ?
14:19:05 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei: it is openstack oriented at the moment
14:19:35 <hw_wutianwei> fdegir:  Ok, I will
14:19:50 <fdegir> you can add a new section to talk about kubespray and move the existing sandbox introductions under new section named osa or something
14:20:36 <fdegir> thx hw_wutianwei if that's all
14:20:42 <hw_wutianwei> yep
14:20:47 <mbuil> is there any k8s scenario in OPNFV apart from nosdn-nofeature?
14:20:59 <fdegir> hwoarang: you also started working on k8s stuff
14:21:16 <fdegir> mbuil: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Fraser+Scenario+Status
14:21:19 <hwoarang> yes opensuse on kubespray
14:21:26 <hwoarang> WIP
14:21:41 <fdegir> #info Work to introduce support for openSUSE started
14:21:55 <fdegir> thx hwoarang
14:22:34 <fdegir> #info I reached out to few Google guys from kubernetes community regarding the tooling they use and I've been told to send mail to test-sig and k8s-users mailing list
14:22:52 <fdegir> will keep you informed if I get a(ny) response
14:23:22 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-sfc
14:23:27 <fdegir> mbuil: mardim: any updates?
14:24:03 <mbuil> #info Our instructions to deploy Pike were updated (to fix the ironic issue) ==> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/sfc/Deploy+OPNFV+SFC+scenarios
14:24:51 <fdegir> mbuil: about osa shabump?
14:25:09 <fdegir> mbuil: are there any serious fixes you are expecting?
14:25:26 <mbuil> #info mardim and I are looking into the CI/CD pipeline of ODL. We would like to be able to test different versions of ODL as we do with OpenStack. mardim is becoming the maintainer of the .deb package and I am trying to create the pipeline for opensuse
14:26:12 <mbuil> fdegir: yes, a lot :)
14:26:18 <fdegir> mbuil: ok
14:26:29 <mbuil> There is a tacker patch which was submitted today
14:26:38 <fdegir> mbuil: we will turn our focus to hacking functest and disabling the failing testcase
14:27:01 <fdegir> mbuil: and try to bump sha asap
14:27:26 <hwoarang> there are some galera fixes that we need too
14:27:35 <fdegir> and about mardim maintaining deb and you creating opensuse pipeline
14:27:37 <hwoarang> upstream made changes in mirror dir layout and broke stuff
14:27:44 <fdegir> both are great news so thank you a lot
14:27:54 <fdegir> i am sure there are other people who need them
14:28:27 <fdegir> is that all for sfc mbuil?
14:28:30 <mbuil> fdegir: ideally, we will need a second bump to move openstack to February to consume tacker changes and odl-ansible changes. But we could create a a-r-r in the OPNFV-SFC repo until we reach those SHAs
14:28:36 <mardim> fdegir, Sorry I was late
14:28:51 <fdegir> mbuil: once we have functest, the thing could be automated and making things faster
14:28:54 <mardim> so I create some an ODL nitrogen SR1 package
14:28:59 <mardim> for ubuntu
14:29:04 <mardim> to my private PPA
14:29:17 <mardim> adn when It is tested and works
14:29:21 <fdegir> we should move to official queens ocne it's released around the end of february
14:29:32 <mardim> I will upload it to the official ODL-team PPa
14:29:41 <mardim> thso are the updates I have related to XCI
14:29:42 <fdegir> mardim: +1
14:29:54 <mardim> sorry for the delay !
14:30:04 <fdegir> mardim: no problem at all
14:30:17 <mbuil> regarding the ODL pipeline, we might create some sort of blueprint to discuss how to do it
14:30:33 <mardim> le tme send you the link for my PPA : https://launchpad.net/~mardim/+archive/ubuntu/odl-nitrogen
14:30:37 <mbuil> because ODL needs to be built, etc... so there are things that change compared to openstack
14:30:44 <mardim> if anyone wants to test it be my guest :)
14:31:02 <fdegir> mbuil: I think you can continue the thread and put your ideas there
14:31:29 <mbuil> ok
14:31:30 <fdegir> mbuil: I'm not sure if odl has something like blueprint or you propose patches to odl releng and gather feedback
14:31:45 <fdegir> let's move
14:31:55 <fdegir> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-bgpvpn
14:32:00 <fdegir> peri: hello
14:32:06 <peri> I have got latest ODL nitrogen deb package from mardim and started testing BGPVPN control plane with it
14:32:18 <fdegir> #info peri got latest ODL nitrogen deb package from mardim and started testing BGPVPN control plane with it
14:32:23 <mardim> peri it is installed succesfully and started ?
14:32:39 <peri> yes, i see it installed and configured bgpvpn server
14:32:48 <mardim> thanks god !!
14:32:50 <mardim> :)
14:33:04 <peri> but i am yet to start remaining tests. will update you :)
14:33:10 <mardim> ok
14:33:18 <peri> we also found an issue with OVS 2.8.0 for L3 packet handling in the data path. The fix got merged into OVS 2.8 branch yesterday. will need to pull the OVS release with this fix
14:33:45 <fdegir> #info an issue has been found with OVS 2.8.0 for L3 packet handling in the data path. The fix got merged into OVS 2.8 branch yesterday. will need to pull the OVS release with this fix
14:34:25 <peri> how do we do that in os neutron role ?
14:34:42 <peri> right now we can install it only from source
14:35:29 <peri> i.e. from https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/tree/branch-2.8
14:36:31 <mbuil> peri: as far as I know, in sfc we are installing it from a repo
14:37:02 <peri> yes mbuil, i think we can discuss offline later about how it can be done
14:37:11 <fdegir> good
14:37:14 <fdegir> anything else peri?
14:37:17 <peri> The upstrean review is still pending for so long time: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523907/. please do it.
14:37:45 <fdegir> #info Patches are waiting for review for quite some time. Everyone is welcomed to review them.
14:37:47 <peri> Not able to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522598/ due to gate failures at neutron role. the gate job is consistently failing due to other issues
14:37:55 <fdegir> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523907/
14:38:31 <fdegir> hwoarang: I'm not sure if you have time but if you do, you know what to do :/ ^
14:38:44 <fdegir> #info Failures in gate is also slowing down the progress
14:38:52 <fdegir> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522598/
14:39:02 <hwoarang> right resolving the merge would be a good start :)
14:39:08 <fdegir> hehe
14:39:19 <peri> i have been trying to push /c/522598 for long time without a success
14:39:35 <hwoarang> sorry about that will push for it from now on
14:40:00 <peri> its simply demotivating :(
14:40:18 <fdegir> peri: I think it is important to get zuul +1 and fixing merge conflicts so people know something passed basic tests and ready for review
14:40:32 <fdegir> peri: I know zuul is a bit shaky lately but we have to keep trying
14:40:56 <mbuil> peri: my experience is that if you don't get a +1 from Zuul, OSA people think you are still working on it and don't require a review
14:41:05 <hwoarang> that's about right
14:41:12 <fdegir> tbh, it is probably same with many projects
14:41:15 <hwoarang> it's very low in the dashboard
14:41:20 <hwoarang> in the OSA dashboard
14:41:28 <hwoarang> all zuul -1 reviews
14:41:47 <peri> but failure for c/523907 is due to different reason. this is what i saw it in the logs
14:41:56 <peri> so couldn't do much about it
14:42:21 <hwoarang> peri: if it's for different reasons we normally fix these so you need to recheck and rebase
14:42:29 <hwoarang> at least right now the integration repo has zuul + 1
14:42:40 <hwoarang> :(
14:42:47 <fdegir> peri: anything else you want to add?
14:43:04 <peri> thats it :)
14:43:49 <fdegir> thanks peri
14:43:56 <fdegir> #topic Centos Issues
14:44:13 <fdegir> #info Centos started failing and voting is disabled for them
14:44:23 <fdegir> ttallgren: did you have chance to look at it?
14:45:03 <ttallgren> Yes, I started doing that but nothing to report yet
14:45:15 <fdegir> thanks for looking into it!
14:45:20 <fdegir> #topic Documentation Updates
14:45:44 <fdegir> #info ttallgren added xci-dev-guide during opnfv doc hacfest last week
14:45:48 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51445/
14:46:17 <fdegir> #info Please review so we can have a good dev guide, helping others who might need the info for the work they intend to bring in
14:46:32 <fdegir> and thanks ttallgren for getting the work started
14:46:40 <ttallgren> No problem
14:47:06 <fdegir> #topic What about Kolla?
14:47:11 <fdegir> electrocucaracha: david_Orange: ^
14:47:35 <david_Orange> i had no time to work on it
14:47:51 <electrocucaracha> I rebased the WIP patch https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/47995/
14:47:54 <fdegir> david_Orange: I know, just wanted to continue making fun
14:48:00 <fdegir> electrocucaracha: thanks for that
14:48:12 <fdegir> electrocucaracha: but can we get some input please before sending more patches?
14:48:53 <electrocucaracha> fdegir: what kind of input?
14:49:06 <fdegir> like the one I asked last week and the week before
14:49:15 <fdegir> the reasons, benefits, differences
14:49:19 <electrocucaracha> fdegir: ohh that one
14:49:24 <fdegir> like brief overview about what kolla brings in
14:49:27 <fdegir> because
14:49:47 <fdegir> we have some more people interested in xci and we need to set a precedence/way of working
14:49:51 <fdegir> which is the next topic
14:50:11 <fdegir> let's switch topic and I'll ask this again next week
14:50:19 <fdegir> #topic OpenStack Helm in XCI
14:50:20 <electrocucaracha> sure, besides the etherpad link where it was made some important discussions right?
14:51:00 <fdegir> #info I've been introduced to OSH PTL and he was interested to learn more about XCI and possibility to collaborate
14:51:58 <fdegir> #info I'll ask him the same things I've been asking about Kolla; what kind of use cases OSH can help with, what are the differences and let the team decide
14:53:23 <fdegir> we can talk about this more and have conversation directly with PTL during one of the meetings so you know what it is and ask questions
14:53:36 <fdegir> #topic XCI Committer Promotions
14:54:04 <fdegir> #info as you know, TSC approved committer list per subrepo and it is time for us to get the process started
14:54:34 <fdegir> #info We are working on this and things should start happening soon
14:55:27 <fdegir> #info This will be accompanies with an improved way of working like putting some more effort in reviewing stuff and requiring 2 +2s for patches to be merged so we keep things in good shape
14:55:48 <fdegir> #info Committer list will frequently be reviewed
14:56:08 <fdegir> any questions, ping me please
14:56:14 <fdegir> #topic AOB
14:56:19 <fdegir> anyone wants to bring anything?
14:56:59 <electrocucaracha> hwoarang: I modify the proxy patch with the use of a galaxy role, can you take a look later?
14:57:33 <fdegir> #info breaking news: the patch to disable snaps volume test is under review
14:57:34 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/51849/
14:57:50 <fdegir> thank you all and talk to you next week!
14:57:57 <fdegir> keep up the great work
14:57:59 <david_Orange> fdegir, it may be out of meeting, but if we an have a talk about xci "not an installer" in the code it could be a good thing
14:58:00 <fdegir> #endmeeting