14:00:50 <hwoarang> #startmeeting Cross Community CI
14:00:50 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Mar 21 14:00:50 2018 UTC.  The chair is hwoarang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:50 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:00:50 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cross_community_ci'
14:00:56 <hwoarang> #topic Rollcall
14:00:59 <hwoarang> identify yourselves
14:01:05 <jmorgan1> #info Jack Morgan
14:01:06 <mardim> #info Dimitrios Markou
14:01:09 <hw_wutianwei_> #info Tianwei Wu
14:01:16 <hwoarang> fdegir is away so i will chair the meeting this week. Hopefully it will be short
14:01:21 <hwoarang> #info Markos Chandras
14:01:30 <electrocucaracha> #info Victor Morales
14:01:40 <hwoarang> agenda is on the usual place
14:01:42 <hwoarang> #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/xci-meetings
14:01:57 <hwoarang> please add anything that you think it's missing
14:02:05 <hwoarang> i will wait 1 min before we begin
14:03:19 <David_Orange> #info David Blaisonneau
14:03:42 <hwoarang> ok moving on
14:04:13 <hwoarang> #topic High Priority Items
14:04:36 <hwoarang> #info CI verification jobs for both internal and external scenario have been enabled
14:04:50 <hwoarang> which basically means that CI will test the right thing based on what your patchset modifies
14:05:15 <hwoarang> #info centos is not voting and needs love
14:05:47 <hwoarang> #info merge jobs has also been enabled for internal and external scenarios
14:06:08 <hwoarang> so the taking point here is that CI is doing well, but if you care about centos it's time to step up :)
14:06:38 <hwoarang> #info functest - openstack healthcheck is used in verify and merge jobs
14:06:49 <hwoarang> #info functest - smoke test integration is WIP
14:07:04 <hwoarang> #info functest - k8s healthcheck integration is WIP
14:07:42 <hwoarang> #info baremetal - patches at https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/status:open+project:releng-xci+branch:master+topic:stabilization
14:07:46 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/status:open+project:releng-xci+branch:master+topic:stabilization
14:07:56 <hwoarang> so anything that you would like to add, discuss etc?
14:08:37 <hwoarang> I encourage you to actually try the BM patches and review them.
14:08:39 <mbuil> #info Manuel Buil
14:09:10 <David_Orange> and feel free to contact me for any support on PDF/IDF creation for your infra
14:09:14 <mbuil> hwoarang: those jobs are not voting right?
14:09:20 <epalper> #info Periyasamy Palanisamy
14:09:22 <mbuil> merge jobs I mean
14:10:46 <hwoarang> mbuil: probably not
14:10:51 <hwoarang> but i am not too sure
14:11:24 <hwoarang> ok moving on
14:11:27 <hwoarang> #topic Quick Status Check for the Scenarios
14:11:37 <hwoarang> scenario people anything that you would like to say?
14:12:44 <mbuil> no update from sfc. Still working on patches
14:12:53 <hw_wutianwei_> hwoarang:  I am try to create the k8-canal-nofeature scenario
14:13:05 <mardim> #info do not use ansible <2.4.3
14:13:17 <mardim> #info will fail with SSL error
14:13:18 <mbuil> mardim: what is the problem?
14:13:52 <hwoarang> #info hw_wutianwei is working on the k8-canal-nofeature scenario
14:13:53 <mardim> mbuil, if we use ansible lower that 2.4.3 it will give SSL error
14:14:05 <mardim> is a bug in Ansible if I am not mistaken
14:14:11 <hwoarang> mardim: something else is missing it's very unlikely for ansible to have broken ssl for all these years ;p
14:14:40 <mardim> hwoarang, when I changed the ansible version
14:14:40 <hwoarang> maybe 2.4.3 pulled just a pip dependency that you were missing before
14:14:50 <hwoarang> and fixed it by 'accident'
14:14:50 <mardim> SFC pike deployed succesfully
14:15:04 <hwoarang> like python-cryptography
14:15:35 <mardim> hwoarang, Yes Maybe that too
14:15:41 <mardim> hwoarang, To be honest
14:15:59 <mardim> hwoarang, I din't search it furhter after it deployed succesfully
14:16:06 <mardim> :)
14:16:10 <hwoarang> so lets figure it out the next time it happens
14:16:16 <hwoarang> ok scenarios are good then moving on
14:16:18 <mardim> hwoarang, cool
14:16:23 <epalper> The upstream reviews for bgpvpn scenario are merged in osa and ansible-opendaylight. will work with fdegir in updating xci sha's
14:16:53 <hwoarang> #info bgpvpn scenarion merged in osa/queens ansible-opendaylight. Need to bump shas soon
14:17:03 <hwoarang> #undo
14:17:03 <collabot`> Removing item from minutes: <MeetBot.ircmeeting.items.Info object at 0x2514f90>
14:17:06 <hwoarang> can't type
14:17:13 <hwoarang> #info bgpvpn scenario merged in osa/queens and ansible-opendaylight. Need to bump shas soon
14:17:17 <hwoarang> ok thanks epalper
14:17:35 <mardim> hwoarang, mbuil more info here https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/25402
14:17:57 <hwoarang> i think we will do one more queens bump before moving to rocky to be honest
14:18:50 <hwoarang> #info ansible -2.3 is having issues with ssl - https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/25402
14:19:06 <hwoarang> #info possibly affecting OSA pins < Queens
14:19:23 <hwoarang> thanks mardim
14:19:34 <hwoarang> ok nothing else from scenarios i suppose
14:19:38 <hwoarang> #topic - AoB
14:19:59 <hwoarang> anything for ONS next week worth mentioning here?
14:20:39 <mbuil> mardim and I are showing a demo in the LFN booth on Wednesday and Thursday :)
14:20:55 <mbuil> demo about XCI. Pass by and talk to us! We like people ;)
14:21:11 <hwoarang> #info ONS -  mardim and mbuil  are showing an XCI demo in the LFN booth on Wednesday and Thursday
14:21:16 <epalper> I will be giving demo on BGPVPN
14:21:27 <mardim> I will give candies for free :)
14:21:34 <mbuil> I forgot epalper is also in the demo :)
14:21:41 <hwoarang> epalper: based on XCI righ? :D
14:21:58 <epalper> yes hwoarang, from XCI :)
14:22:02 <hwoarang> #info ONS - epalper will have a demo about XCI BGPVPN
14:22:04 <hwoarang> cool!
14:22:19 <hwoarang> better not break anything by then :p
14:22:27 <hwoarang> *until then!
14:22:47 <epalper> I just had trial run with latest xci, it works :)
14:23:01 <hwoarang> great
14:23:08 <hwoarang> good luck with your demos then!
14:24:15 <hwoarang> anything else to discuss today?
14:25:24 <David_Orange> one thing
14:25:41 <hwoarang> yes
14:25:45 <David_Orange> just about PDF/IDF introduction for installer/scenarios
14:26:22 <David_Orange> i will propose some atomic patches (after ONS :)), but they will be based on https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53893
14:26:52 <David_Orange> this is PDF/IDF for deployment in VM, with the same config we are using today
14:27:36 <David_Orange> the idea is to continue deploying on VM as today but more and more getting IPs and other POD values from PDF
14:27:56 <David_Orange> then introduce PDF/IDF from BM
14:28:19 <David_Orange> is there any comment/proposition about this subject or the way to do it ?
14:28:31 <hwoarang> #info David to introduce pdf/idf for installer/scenarios for VM and BM deployments
14:28:41 <hwoarang> David_Orange: how does that relate to your existing patches?
14:28:45 <hwoarang> because i got confused a bit
14:29:25 <David_Orange> the next patches will source those config files
14:29:38 <hwoarang> your patches do not contain IDF/PDF right? so i guess this is a continuation
14:30:16 <David_Orange> the stabilisation patches ? yes, they contains the same, and it is a continuation
14:30:45 <David_Orange> but with separate patches, to introducte them smothly
14:30:52 <David_Orange> smoothly
14:31:21 <hwoarang> ok so for me, it would look like this 1) get idf/pdf files 2) make bifrost deploy using idf/pdf so we keep XCI working 3) bring BM
14:31:23 <David_Orange> am i more clear ?
14:31:23 <hwoarang> something like that
14:31:37 <hwoarang> would that make sense?
14:32:06 <David_Orange> for now 1/2 is working with the proto
14:32:31 <hwoarang> yeah so i guess that also means start moving bits from proto to real xci correct?
14:32:50 <David_Orange> but not the 3, for the installers we need to introduce more template configs
14:33:34 <David_Orange> after review, yes, if it get the agreement
14:33:54 <OPNFV-Gerrit-Bot> Manuel Buil proposed releng-xci: Connect ODL CI-CD to XCI  https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/53173
14:33:56 <hwoarang> ok then
14:34:24 <hwoarang> getting things in proto is easy for people to try. we will see how to bring them to xci after that
14:34:48 <hwoarang> thank you for your work btw
14:35:13 <David_Orange> hwoarang: yes, that is why it is better to keep it in proto to let reviewers review this large patches bundle
14:35:23 <David_Orange> hwoarang: thx
14:35:54 <David_Orange> and now this will be to introduce PDF/IDF in installers/proto
14:36:05 <hwoarang> ok thank you for the update
14:36:06 <hwoarang> anything else
14:36:13 <David_Orange> i know the PDF/IDF is a bit obscure, i hope i am clear
14:37:23 <David_Orange> hwoarang: from my side
14:37:26 <David_Orange> no
14:37:27 <hwoarang> yes it takes a bit to digest that
14:37:41 <hwoarang> anybody else?
14:37:48 <David_Orange> hwoarang: i understand that :)
14:38:00 <electrocucaracha> I have two patches that are not triggering jenkins jobs https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54125/ https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54123/
14:38:30 <electrocucaracha> should I need to resubmit them?
14:38:58 <hwoarang> electrocucaracha: no because changes in the VM script are being ignored
14:39:12 <hwoarang> for security reasons. if you mess with the VM script you can damage the host
14:39:19 <electrocucaracha> :O
14:39:33 <hwoarang> so need manual verification
14:40:08 <electrocucaracha> got it, in that case can you make the honors to take a look?
14:40:14 <electrocucaracha> hehehe
14:40:22 <hwoarang> yes I will
14:41:01 <hwoarang> anything else?
14:41:13 <electrocucaracha> and regarding the patch that renames bridges, we decided to offer different approach
14:41:25 <electrocucaracha> https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/52841/
14:42:20 <electrocucaracha> David_Orange: suggested to have a variable for selected bridged or non-bridged networks
14:42:39 <hwoarang> i will review that too
14:43:06 <hwoarang> anything else?
14:43:06 <electrocucaracha> I offered the alternative to use based on the installer selected
14:43:08 <David_Orange> the fact is that kolla prefers to work on interfaces, not on bridges (like osa)
14:43:48 <David_Orange> electrocucaracha patch is to set or not the bridges
14:44:01 <David_Orange> electrocucaracha: i will do it tomorrow, thx :)
14:45:00 <hwoarang> ok understood
14:45:04 <electrocucaracha> yeah, the thing is that maybe we should consider to configure the networks differently for every installer
14:45:32 <electrocucaracha> pros more flexibility, cons we'll be loosing a reference
14:46:24 <hwoarang> let me review that patch to understand the big picture
14:46:32 <electrocucaracha> +1
14:46:40 <hwoarang> then we can discuss so i dont say stupid stuff right now
14:47:38 <hwoarang> ok unless there is something else to discuss we can end here for today
14:47:56 <David_Orange> thx hwoarang
14:48:03 <hwoarang> #endmeeting