13:00:12 <fdegir> #startmeeting Cross Community CI
13:00:12 <collabot> Meeting started Wed Jul 11 13:00:12 2018 UTC.  The chair is fdegir. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:00:12 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:00:12 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'cross_community_ci'
13:00:35 <fdegir> I know hwoarang and mbuil_ are probably busy this week and others might be on holiday already
13:00:45 <jmorgan1> hey
13:00:52 <fdegir> hello jmorgan1
13:01:20 <hw_wutianwei_> #info Tianwei Wu
13:01:33 <epalper> #info Periyasamy Palanisamy
13:01:43 <joekidder> #info Joe Kidder
13:02:04 <fdegir> no agenda today so we can start with the 2 scenarios and if anyone wants to bring another topic, we can do that
13:02:10 <fdegir> hi joekidder epalper
13:02:15 <fdegir> #topic k8-nosdn-istio
13:02:15 <jmorgan1> #info Jack Morgan
13:02:26 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: so the patches are up for review
13:02:39 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/58357/
13:02:44 <fdegir> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/58471/
13:02:44 <hw_wutianwei_> fdegir:  yep
13:03:24 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: I see the 2nd patch failed on jenkins
13:03:25 <fdegir> https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/xci-verify-ubuntu-deploy-virtual-master/1814/console
13:03:45 <fdegir> is it due to code or should we do a reverify?
13:03:48 <hw_wutianwei_> you need merged first patch
13:04:04 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: i think the way you did should work
13:04:28 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: sorry
13:04:42 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: have you tried verifying using the refspec without merging the actual scenario?
13:04:58 <joekidder> hi fdegir epalper jmorgan1 hw_wutianwei_
13:05:25 <hw_wutianwei_> fdegir: I have tested on my local enviroment
13:05:45 <epalper> yes fdegir, refspec works for scenarios
13:06:07 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: can i amend the change and get the scenario tested?
13:06:18 <hw_wutianwei_> fdegir:  you can check the  previous patchset
13:06:19 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: so we merge that one and then amend the 2nd change to switch tomaster
13:06:55 <hw_wutianwei_> fdegir:  I think so
13:06:59 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: yep, i've seen that but this might be a good opportunity to demostrate how an open change can be verified
13:08:01 <OPNFV-Gerrit-Bot> Fatih Degirmenci proposed releng-xci: [xci] integrate istio in XCI  https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/58471
13:08:25 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: if you look at the new patch and to diff
13:08:26 <fdegir> https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/58471/5..6/xci/opnfv-scenario-requirements.yml
13:08:45 <fdegir> ci will now verify your patch https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/58357/
13:09:22 <fdegir> doing stuff on github is fine
13:09:49 <fdegir> this is just to show how things work if the change is on opnfv gerrit and not merged
13:10:18 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: anything else?
13:10:43 <hw_wutianwei_> no
13:10:56 <fdegir> hw_wutianwei_: thanks for fixing this scenario as well!
13:11:03 <fdegir> #topic k8-calico-onap
13:11:10 <fdegir> jmorgan1: how is it going?
13:11:14 <jmorgan1> good
13:11:31 <jmorgan1> electrocucaracha and I are working on the scenario
13:11:40 <fdegir> great
13:11:52 <jmorgan1> we have a patch that needs to be sent to gerrit after clean up
13:12:05 <fdegir> i learnt that the onap deployment is a bit shaky
13:12:12 <fdegir> i'm not sure if you also see similar issue
13:12:30 <jmorgan1> we got some errors with bifrost
13:12:48 <fdegir> when was this?
13:12:54 <jmorgan1> last Friday
13:13:01 <joekidder> jmorgan1: how many nodes in your k8 cluster?
13:13:02 <fdegir> hwoarang was working on integrating pdf and idf
13:13:03 <jmorgan1> not sure how to report defects
13:13:09 <fdegir> and things should be fine
13:13:14 <fdegir> i deployed this week - monday
13:13:21 <fdegir> could be temporary problem
13:13:42 <jmorgan1> fdegir: ok, i will try again today to see if we still have the problem
13:13:52 * electrocucaracha hopefully it is not a bifrost problem
13:14:01 <jmorgan1> fdegir: otherwse, how to report issues like this?
13:14:19 <fdegir> better to chat with hwoarang and yolanda_ here first
13:14:24 <jmorgan1> joekidder: its the virtual deployment
13:14:35 <fdegir> and if it is a genuine issue upstream then you can either send a fix there
13:14:41 <fdegir> or open a bug report on launchpad
13:15:02 <jmorgan1> ok
13:15:17 <fdegir> it seems they migrated to storyboard
13:15:17 <fdegir> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/941
13:15:28 <joekidder> jmorgan1: thanks - even so, how many nodes do you create in your virtual deployment?
13:15:41 <electrocucaracha> finally? woo
13:16:15 <jmorgan1> joekidder: just 3 i beleive while testing
13:17:24 <joekidder> jmorgan1: cool. thanks.  one level of virtualization?  I tried deploying k8/onap on a beefed up virtual OPNFV pod in LaaS, and it seemed cpu utilization was crippling
13:19:58 <fdegir> joekidder: regarding your first question - as jmorgan1 says we started with 3 node cluster; 1 master and 2 workers
13:20:08 <fdegir> joekidder: this is based on the Orange implementation
13:20:32 <fdegir> joekidder: https://gitlab.com/Orange-OpenSource/onap_oom_automatic_installation/
13:20:33 <joekidder> fdegir: thanks
13:20:54 <fdegir> but they changed the no of nodes/specs recently
13:22:02 <fdegir> https://gitlab.com/Orange-OpenSource/kubespray_automatic_installation/commit/8331566683e902bb3a62c2c7e65c93908a620f36
13:22:07 <joekidder> fdegir: yes, ONAP Beijing seems to have gotten bigger... more k8s pods
13:22:45 <fdegir> jmorgan1: electrocucaracha: you might want to look at the 2nd link as well
13:22:58 <fdegir> electrocucaracha probably knows this so just to be sure
13:23:05 <fdegir> moving on
13:23:07 <jmorgan1> fdegir: ok, will do. Hopefully we will make better progress this week
13:23:17 <fdegir> #topic os-nosdn-osm
13:23:32 <fdegir> after switching to pdf and idf and using opnfv vm for driving stuff
13:23:43 <fdegir> osm installation started failing with lxd configuration
13:24:08 <fdegir> i'll look at it after the holidays
13:24:32 <fdegir> #topic PDF and IDF Implementation
13:24:52 <fdegir> XCI now uses PDF and IDF for virtual deployments so we are one step closer to full dynamic CI
13:25:37 <fdegir> baremetal work is also going on so once this is fixed, I believe we will be done with the Infra WG dynamic CI, PDF, IDF, doing things in VM etc.
13:26:11 <fdegir> that was all I had
13:26:18 <fdegir> anyone wants to bring anything else?
13:27:11 <joekidder> fdegir: minor comment on arm64 xci deploy...
13:27:21 <fdegir> joekidder: yes
13:27:29 <joekidder> hit a problem with trying to load syslinux by bifrost.
13:27:45 <joekidder> apparently syslinux doesn't make sense on arm64...
13:28:14 <joekidder> I noticed that https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002934 indicates they might remove syslinux from bifrost role
13:28:49 <fdegir> ok, once that goes in then things should be fine
13:28:52 <joekidder> so hopefully that would unblock until the next thing;)
13:29:03 <joekidder> yes, there's usually only one problem!:)
13:29:06 <fdegir> joekidder: on the other hand, don't you use x86 jumphost for baremetal deployments?
13:29:24 <fdegir> i know this was for virtual btw
13:29:32 <joekidder> fdegir: not anymore.  for armband, it's all arm64
13:29:33 <jmorgan1> joekidder: you mean no arm64 support for syslinux?
13:29:42 <fdegir> joekidder: i didn't know that
13:29:42 <joekidder> jmorgan1: yes
13:30:11 <fdegir> then we can wait for a bit to see if there is any progress with that storyboard item
13:30:17 <fdegir> if not, we can start pinging
13:30:19 <joekidder> jmorgan1: AlexAvadanii said that syslinux doesn't make sense to him for arm64, as it's pretty x86-specific low level
13:30:22 <jmorgan1> joekidder: is it a lack of a arm64 build or development is needed?
13:30:49 <jmorgan1> ok, makes sense
13:31:19 <fdegir> thanks for the update joekidder
13:31:45 <fdegir> so, I'll be on holiday until August 2nd and the next meeting will be on July 25th, chaired by mbuil_
13:31:58 <joekidder> jmorgan1: not sure.  The first mention I saw was the person from bifrost (Julia) saying they'd look at syslinux for arm64, and recently in the storyboard she seemed to think it made more sense to remove the dependence on syslinux.
13:32:06 <fdegir> I hope you also get some time off and talk to you in few weeks
13:32:12 <joekidder> fdegir: no problem.  Have a great holiday!!!
13:32:18 <fdegir> thanks
13:32:20 <fdegir> #endmeeting