#opendaylight-group-policy: gbp_status_arch

Meeting summary

1. agenda (tbachman, 17:00:39)
   1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Group_Policy:Sub-Groups:STATUS#Team_Meeting Link to today’s agenda (tbachman, 17:00:53)
   2. https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-group-policy/2015/gbp_status_arch/opendaylight-group-policy-gbp_status_arch.2015-03-27-17.00.html Link to last week’s meeting minutes (tbachman, 17:01:08)
   
   
2. Trello board (tbachman, 17:02:36)
   1. https://trello.com/b/yc0xHFlv/opendaylight-groupbasedpolicy-lithium Link to GBP Trello board for Lithium (tbachman, 17:04:15)
   2. alagalah says that the offset strategy for Lithium has helped out quite a bit (tbachman, 17:06:22)
   3. alagalah reminds folks that API freeze is 4/16, which is about 2 weeks away (tbachman, 17:06:36)
   4. alagalah says the two areas we’re focused on are SFC integration and neutron API integration (tbachman, 17:08:15)
   5. alagalah says there’s a new thing for the model — an endpoint identification constraint (tbachman, 17:12:48)
   6. alagalah says this allows us to categorize endpoints based on things like IP prefix; in the future, it can be VLAN ID, MPLS labels, etc. (tbachman, 17:13:14)
   7. alagalah says this allows us to match on IP prefixes, which helps with security groups (tbachman, 17:14:11)
   8. alagalah says there are some other things that were added for future use, like external implicit group, which allows referencing things outside the policy domain (tbachman, 17:15:03)
   9. Sanjay says his understanding was that things external to GBP would be modeled with external EPGs (tbachman, 17:19:46)
   10. Sanjay asks why the new things are needed (tbachman, 17:20:13)
   11. alagalah says this is more about what subjects are in scope, and less wrt external gateways (tbachman, 17:25:10)
   12. alagalah says the latest changes preserves backwards-compatbiliity (tbachman, 17:30:01)
   13. Sanjay asks if we’re going to support multiple EPGs for an EP, given that previously this was implemented using conditions (tbachman, 17:32:05)
   14. alagalah says multiple EPGs will be supported; he emphasizes we aren’t taking away conditions (tbachman, 17:32:32)
   15. Sanjay asks if the forwarding context going to be part of the EPs in addition to the EPG, given that an EP can be in multiple EPGs (tbachman, 17:34:44)
   16. alagalah says EPs now have a field called network containment to address this (tbachman, 17:36:27)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. tbachman (23)
2. odl_meetbot (4)
3. alagalah (0)