16:57:42 <dmm> #startmeeting
16:57:42 <odl_meetbot> Meeting started Fri Jan 31 16:57:42 2014 UTC.  The chair is dmm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:57:42 <odl_meetbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
16:57:56 <dmm> #topic release reviews
16:58:02 <dmm> #info dmm
16:58:08 <dmm> please info in
16:58:12 <tykeal> that's great info ;)
16:58:23 <tykeal> #info Andrew Grimberg for infrastructure support
16:58:23 <regXboi> #info OpenDove: regXboi
16:58:23 <dmm> :-)
16:58:52 <dmm> so this is the agenda we have
16:58:59 <phrobb> #info Phil Robb
16:59:07 <dmm> 9:00am - Call start and roll call
16:59:07 <dmm> 9:10 VTN
16:59:07 <dmm> 9:20 SNMP4SDN
16:59:07 <dmm> 9:30 OpenFlow Plugin
16:59:07 <dmm> 9:40 OpenFlow Protocol Library
16:59:09 <dmm> 9:50 Defense4All
16:59:12 <dmm> 10:00 Controller
16:59:14 <dmm> 10:10 LispFlowMapping Service
16:59:17 <dmm> 10:20 Yang Tools
16:59:19 <dmm> 10:30 OVSDB Integration
16:59:22 <dmm> 10:40 OpenDOVE
16:59:24 <dmm> 10:50 Affinity
16:59:25 <edwarnicke> #info Ed Warnicke for controller ?
16:59:26 <Madhu> #info Madhu ovsdb
16:59:27 <dmm> 11:00 BGP-LS/PCEP
16:59:44 <dmm> my understanding is that the Defense4All folks won't be here
16:59:51 <ChristineH> #info ChristineH and paiwei for SNMP4SDN
17:00:05 <rovarga> #info Robert Varga for bgpcep/yangtools
17:00:18 <dmm> haven't seen the vtn folks yet
17:00:29 <sarath> Sarath from VTN
17:00:30 <dmm> lets give them a minute
17:01:06 <dmm> sarath, can you #info in?
17:01:37 <dmm> first up: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Virtual_Tenant_Network_(VTN):Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:01:47 <rovarga> dmm: could we possibly move yangtools and bgpcep before of controller?
17:02:43 <dmm> rovarga:done
17:02:47 <rovarga> thank you
17:03:03 <edwarnicke> Could I suggest that we ask folks to announce their release review docs popcorn style
17:03:09 <edwarnicke> I think we can parallelize a lot that way
17:03:10 <dbainbri> #info dbainbri the docker chicken
17:03:14 <edwarnicke> Hopefully get through a little quicker
17:04:01 <dmm> edwarnike: sure, but that raises a question. What do we want to do here? everyone read the current (set of) docs then?
17:04:13 <edwarnicke> dmm: I'd say, lets throw them out there
17:04:13 <abhijitkumbhare> #info Abhijit Kumbhare for OpenFlow plugin: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Release_Review
17:04:16 <edwarnicke> Open to questions
17:04:19 <edwarnicke> Get answers
17:04:23 <edwarnicke> And then declare victory :)
17:04:38 <dmm> ok, makes sense
17:04:41 <dkutenic> #info Dana for bgpcep
17:04:52 <networkstatic> #info brent for ovsdb
17:05:11 <dmm> everyone, please post link for your review
17:05:17 <edwarnicke> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Controller:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:05:26 <oflibMichal> #info oflibMichal for the openflowjava
17:05:42 <oflibMichal> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Openflow_Protocol_Library:Release_Notes:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:05:51 <regXboi> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Open_DOVE:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:05:53 <rovarga> #link YANG tools: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/YANG_Tools:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:06:05 <rovarga> #link BGP/PCEP: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/BGP_LS_PCEP:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:06:43 <abhijitkumbhare> #link OpenFlowPlugin: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Release_Review
17:06:52 <dmm> so the way this looks like its going to work is #links will be there, then we will (sequentially) go through the list and if people have questions, then resolve
17:07:12 <edwarnicke> oflibMichal: On the arch doc for openflowjava... wow
17:07:20 <dmm> so will start with VTN @0910
17:07:26 <networkstatic> #link OVSDN https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OVSDB:Release_Review
17:07:26 <ChristineH> #link SNMP4SDN: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:07:56 <edwarnicke> regXboi: You had some extra [ ] here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Open_Dove:Installation#oDMC (fixed)
17:08:04 <oflibMichal> edwarnicke: :-)
17:08:13 <regXboi> edwarnicke: thanks, I'm still filling it in madly
17:08:33 * regXboi wonders where colindixon is
17:08:35 <networkstatic> <3 regXboi
17:08:37 <edwarnicke> regXboi: I noticed :)  Keep on typin :)
17:09:03 <dmm> dunno if I saw a #link for vtn
17:09:34 <dmm> welcome colin
17:09:34 <edwarnicke> rovarga: Is this the much sought after cure for making Eclipse happy: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/YANG_Tools:User_Guide#Source_folder_discovery :)
17:09:42 <colindixon> he dmm
17:09:47 <colindixon> sorry I'm running late
17:09:52 <dmm> no worries
17:10:19 <dmm> ok, lets go
17:10:23 <edwarnicke> rovarga: I see you are at your usual thoroughness: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/BGP_LS_PCEP:Hydrogen_Release_Review ... thank you :)
17:10:43 <dmm> have people looked at the VTN release review doc?
17:10:51 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Virtual_Tenant_Network_(VTN):Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:10:54 <dmm> (in case)
17:11:42 <dmm> first question: security considerations are empty. Knowing how these ususally go (consider RFC security considerations) they are likely to be mostly empty
17:11:55 <edwarnicke> networkstatic: You guys did a great job with your docs, particularly your installation guide: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OVSDB:Installation_Guide
17:12:07 <regXboi> most of the security sections should be blank
17:12:21 <regXboi> because we don't really have a true security model that I've seen
17:12:23 <dmm> regXboi: should?
17:12:31 <regXboi> at this point, i'd think so
17:12:41 <regXboi> or be honest and say "this is open"
17:12:41 <dmm> fair enough
17:12:49 <networkstatic> thanks sir, release notes being done know, community missed but hey they got release revew so still a win :)
17:12:51 <edwarnicke> Does anyone know where suchiramen is for affinity ?
17:13:00 <regXboi> that is one of my notes for Helium though
17:13:05 <regXboi> get a security model in place
17:13:23 <dmm> regXboi: do it in your spare time, shouldn't be too hard :-)
17:13:44 * regXboi *glares* at dmm
17:14:04 <dmm> so can I assume that there are no issues with vtn, or are people still considering...
17:15:23 <networkstatic> lol
17:15:41 <edwarnicke> ChristineH: Your installation troubleshooting is a very good idea :) https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:User_Guide#Installation_Troubleshooting
17:15:45 <dmm> #topic vtn relese review
17:15:48 * colindixon scans the VTN page
17:16:48 <colindixon> the VTN release review document looks good to me
17:17:02 <dmm> colindixion: thnx
17:17:16 <edwarnicke> sarath: You guys did a nice job on your usage examples section: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Virtual_Tenant_Network_(VTN):VTN_Coordinator:RestApi:L2_Network_Example_Using_VTN_Virtualization
17:17:18 <colindixon> Arch Issues and Security Considerations are blank, but that seems fine since we haven't really defined them well at this point...
17:17:20 <rovarga> ChristineH: it would be nice to mention that SNMP throws an exception during startup if the controller is run without privileges to bind the SNMP port
17:17:32 <edwarnicke> #info +1 to vtn release review
17:17:46 <ChristineH> rovarge: ok, sure :)
17:17:58 <colindixon> #info +1 for the VTN release review
17:18:02 <dmm> colindixion: we talked a bit about security considerations and its likely most will be blank (given there is no real security/threat model)
17:18:08 <sarath> thanks ed
17:19:00 <dmm> anyone else want to #info in on vtn, else we'll move on
17:19:16 <dmm> #info +1 to vtn release review
17:19:45 <ChristineH> rovarga: just add your advice in the trouble shooting, thx
17:20:05 <dmm> ok, vtn is done
17:20:11 <dmm> #topic snmp4sdn release review
17:20:29 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:20:33 <dmm> (if you don't have it)
17:21:39 <edwarnicke> ChristineH: Could you #link to the troubleshooting section you added in response to rovarga ?
17:21:53 <edwarnicke> suchiraman: Could you #link you the affinity Release Review doc?
17:22:01 <colindixon> #info +1 for the SNMP4SDN release review, I appreciate the coverage of the architectural and security issues
17:22:53 <ChristineH> #link installatin trouble shooting in snmp4sdn:   https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:User_Guide#Installation_Troubleshooting
17:23:05 <edwarnicke> #info +1 for SNMP4SDN releaser review :)
17:23:18 <rovarga> edwarnicke: added at https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:User_Guide#Installation_Troubleshooting
17:23:28 <suchiraman> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Affinity_Metadata_Service:Release_Review
17:23:31 <edwarnicke> rovarga: ChristineH thanks for the pointers :)
17:24:20 <ChristineH> I think I'll also add the installation trouble shooting in the Installzation Guide
17:24:45 <edwarnicke> suchiraman: Thank you for the link to your release review :)
17:25:41 <dmm> suchiraman: ditto edwarnicke
17:25:52 <sarath> Thanks team for  completing the release review for vtn
17:26:02 <dmm> what I want is a count-down timer that I can put in the #topic
17:26:05 <edwarnicke> sarath: It was our pleasure :)
17:26:20 <edwarnicke> LOL... do we need a meetingbot project for enhancements ;)
17:27:13 <dmm> 2.5 minutes left on snmp4sdn
17:28:35 <colindixon> dmm: there are other features I wan to add to meetbot, but I worry about this: http://xkcd.com/1319/
17:28:58 <dmm> colindixion: :-)
17:29:31 <dmm> not seeing any objections to snmp4sdn, moving on to openflow plugin
17:29:38 <dmm> #topic openflow plugin release review
17:29:46 <tykeal> lol dmm there's a feature on their todo list for having the bot emit time stamps / countdowns. I have no idea if that will ever happen though ;)
17:29:59 <abhijitkumbhare> Again the link is https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Release_Review
17:30:06 <ChristineH> thanks team for the release review for snmp4sdn :)
17:31:25 <dmm> tykeal: something like "#topic foo (%t), countdown(10.0)" or like
17:31:37 <tykeal> heh
17:31:50 <colindixon> abhijitkumbhare: are there known issues with the NSFs and adaptors?
17:31:50 <edwarnicke> dmm: Are we done with SNMP4SDN?
17:31:55 <colindixon> and are those in the bugs
17:31:57 <colindixon> edwarnicke: yes
17:32:02 <edwarnicke> Ah... missed a topic change
17:32:08 <dmm> edwarnicke: yes
17:32:50 <abhijitkumbhare> colindixon: we moved the following to controller: Clustering service not available when using MD-SAL based NSF bundles like Forwarding Rules Manager.
17:33:24 <dmm> www.linkedin.com/pub/anees-shaikh/6/69a/254
17:33:46 <colindixon> abhijitkumbhare: ok
17:34:21 <Madhu> dmm: thanks for sharing. ashaikh congrats
17:34:56 <colindixon> #info +1 to the openflowplugin release review
17:35:09 <dmm> colindixon: thnx
17:35:39 <abhijitkumbhare> colindixon: thx
17:35:46 <edwarnicke> #info +1 openflowplugin release review
17:35:55 <dmm> edwarnicke: ditto
17:36:52 <cdub> minor nit..openflow spec links busted
17:37:07 <cdub> #info +1 openflowplugin release review
17:37:19 <dmm> cdub: thnx
17:37:39 <abhijitkumbhare> Oops - it was working earlier - will need to check again if something overwritten
17:37:40 <colindixon> Also, should it be OF1.0.0, 1.0.1 or 1.0.2?
17:37:42 <dmm> 2.5 minutes left on openflow plugin
17:38:30 <colindixon> #link https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/onf-specifications/openflow the OpenFlow specs in case anyone is interested
17:38:43 <abhijitkumbhare> For 1.0 - its 1.0.0
17:38:49 <edwarnicke> colindixon: Thank you :)
17:38:59 <colindixon> abhijitkumbhare: the ONF is fond of flagrantly ignoring the fact that others link into things and changes links all the damn time
17:39:04 <colindixon> abhijitkumbhare: ok good to know
17:39:57 <colindixon> #info abhijitkumbhare confirms that the support for OF1.0 in openflow plugin is for 1.0.0 (as opposed to 1.0.1 or 1.0.2, although I *think* those are mostly just errata resolving some ambiguities)
17:40:22 <dmm> ok, not hearing any objections to openflowo plugin...
17:40:26 <Madhu> LuisGomez: hi. welcome
17:40:29 <dmm> #topic openflow protocol release review
17:40:42 <dmm> #info openflow protocol release review
17:40:55 <abhijitkumbhare> Thanks folks for the ofplugin review
17:41:02 <dmm> abhijitkumbhare: thank you
17:41:26 <colindixon> do we have a link?
17:41:33 <colindixon> it's not linked in from the scratch space
17:41:36 <oflibMichal> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Openflow_Protocol_Library:Release_Notes:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:41:56 <colindixon> oflibMichal: please add it to the #Scratch part of this page: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Release/Hydrogen
17:42:11 <oflibMichal> colindixon: sure
17:43:50 <colindixon> #info +1 to the openflowjava release review
17:43:57 <edwarnicke> #info +1 to openflowjava release review
17:44:04 <oflibMichal> colindixon: added
17:44:14 <colindixon> oflibMichal: thanks! I see it.
17:44:37 <cdub> #info +1 to the openflowjava review
17:45:20 <cdub> minor nit...first section removal?
17:45:57 <colindixon> cdub: oh yes, brain missed that entirely :p
17:45:59 <oflibMichal> cdub: oh i forgot :D ... agree i will remove it
17:46:08 <cdub> cool
17:46:16 <ashaikh> Madhu: thanks boss
17:46:24 <oflibMichal> cdub: done
17:46:56 <edwarnicke> many eyes make all doc bugs shallow :)
17:47:00 <cdub> oflibMichal: nice,thnaks
17:47:45 <dmm> 2.5 minutes left on openflowjava
17:49:39 <dmm> ok, not hearing any objections to openflow protocol....
17:49:52 <dmm> #topic defense4all release review
17:49:52 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Defense4All:Release_Notes:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:49:55 <dmm> #info defense4all not here (?)
17:49:57 <oflibMichal> thanks for the review
17:50:06 <dmm> oflibMichal: our pleasure, thank you
17:50:20 <edwarnicke> phrobb: Did we have a committed person for defense4all?
17:50:34 <dmm> #info my understanding is that the defense4all people aren't here, so mvoing ono
17:51:05 <dmm> #info s/mvoing ono/moving on/
17:51:15 <edwarnicke> phrobb: Could you try to scare up the defense4all folks?
17:51:42 <edwarnicke> dmm: zero objection from me to moving on
17:51:43 <dmm> I think its Shabbat their time
17:51:45 <cdub> it's effectively saturday night in israel
17:51:54 <edwarnicke> ah
17:52:09 <dmm> moving on...
17:52:12 <dmm> #topic yang tools release review
17:52:12 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/YANG_Tools:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:52:14 * edwarnicke makes mental note for next time
17:52:14 <phrobb> Defense4all folks cannot present today.  It is Sabbath
17:52:28 <edwarnicke> phrobb: Thank you for being on top of that
17:52:48 <dmm> We're on yang tools
17:54:01 <rovarga> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/YANG_Tools:Hydrogen_Release_Review
17:55:26 <colindixon> #info +1 for the yangtools release review
17:55:44 <edwarnicke> #info +1 for yangtools release review
17:55:48 <colindixon> minor nit, there should probably be a note saying "no features EOLed as it is the first release"
17:56:00 <cdub> #info +1 for yangtools
17:56:01 <rovarga> colindixon: will add momentarily
17:56:07 <colindixon> also, please link it in to this page: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Release/Hydrogen
17:56:15 <colindixon> in the #scratch space
17:57:23 * tykeal plays minor devils advocate. Isn't net-virt-platform effectively EOLed ;)
17:58:22 <dmm> 2 mins left on yang tools
17:58:39 <edwarnicke> tykeal: We can't do a termination review for it quite yet: http://www.opendaylight.org/project-lifecycle-releases#ProjectTypes
17:58:44 <cdub> tykeal: heh
17:58:50 <tykeal> lol
17:58:55 <dmm> what edwarnicke said
17:59:22 <dmm> #info ok, hearing no objections to yang tools...
17:59:31 <dmm> #topic bgp-ls/pcep release review
17:59:32 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/BGP_LS_PCEP:Hydrogen_Release_Review
18:00:21 <dmm> we're on bgp-ls/pcep
18:01:32 <cdub> #info +1 for bgpcep
18:01:44 <edwarnicke> #info +1 for bgpcep
18:02:11 <colindixon> #info +1 for bgppcep
18:02:20 * colindixon is the only one who can spell
18:02:43 <cdub> well, project name is bgpcep ;)
18:02:46 * tykeal notes the project name is bgpcep not bgppcep ;)
18:02:58 <colindixon> huh
18:02:59 <rovarga> yup, that's on purpose
18:03:01 * edwarnicke definitely can't spell
18:03:02 <tykeal> I tripple checked that when I was building out the repo
18:03:33 <colindixon> damn portmanteau making me look like a dummy
18:05:15 <colindixon> opendove ckd$ find . -iname "*test*"
18:05:18 <colindixon> do we have unit tests
18:05:49 <regXboi> colindixon ?
18:06:05 <colindixon> regXboi: sorry, wrong window
18:06:16 <edwarnicke> dmm: Could we do controller next?
18:06:32 <dmm> colindixion: windows making you look like a dummy? :-)
18:06:38 <dmm> edwarnicke: sure
18:06:43 <edwarnicke> dmm: Thanks :)
18:06:51 <dmm> thats what the queue looks like
18:08:13 <dmm> 2 minutes left on bgppcep
18:09:57 <dmm> #info ok, hearing no objections to bgppcep...
18:09:57 <dmm> #topic controller release review
18:09:57 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Controller:Hydrogen_Release_Review
18:10:06 <dmm> we're on controller
18:10:39 <colindixon> minor nit, but can we fix the features table to left align?
18:10:58 <Madhu> The features section
18:11:07 <Madhu> should it contain all the Hydrogen features ?
18:11:11 <Madhu> or just MD-SAL related ones ?
18:11:31 <colindixon> the table is just hard to read since all the text in "description" is right aligned
18:11:47 <edwarnicke> Madhu: It was filled out by the folks working on it... they only know about the MD-SAL features
18:11:54 <colindixon> #info +1 for controller release review
18:12:07 <edwarnicke> If you look at the release plan... the only AD-SAL planned feature was packet filtering, which was dropped
18:12:42 <Madhu> edwarnicke: okay. got it
18:12:48 <colindixon> edwarnicke: in that case, it should probably be called out int he Schedule, not that it's a problem
18:12:57 <Madhu> I will go ahead and update it :)
18:13:07 <edwarnicke> Madhu: Thanks :)
18:13:43 <edwarnicke> Madhu: Please let me know when you've updated the Schedule section to reflect that packet filtering was dropped :)
18:14:10 <Madhu> edwarnicke: i don't know anything about packet filtering
18:14:21 <Madhu> when and what was dropped ? :)
18:14:25 <colindixon> can I fix the table, it's grating on my graphic designer hat?
18:14:44 <regXboi> fix the table :)
18:15:00 <edwarnicke> colindixon: Please do
18:15:04 <aboch> is current openflow 1.0 plugin still default option in Hydrogen rel ?
18:15:25 <edwarnicke> aboch: yes
18:15:28 <aboch> if so, then I think it should be listed. If not, pls disregard
18:15:36 <Madhu> aboch: will u be able to update the feature list as well ?
18:15:52 <Madhu> with the AD-SAL features ?
18:15:53 <edwarnicke> Was the of10 plugin worked on in the Hydrogen release?
18:16:13 <edwarnicke> The only features we had listed in the Release Plan for the AD-SAL was packet filtering, which was dropped.
18:16:31 <colindixon> edwarnicke: the OF10 plugin had bugs fixed
18:16:41 <colindixon> and some performance fixes
18:16:46 <colindixon> edwarnicke: table fixed
18:16:58 <edwarnicke> colindixon: Thank you :)
18:17:29 <dmm> 2.5 minutes left on controller, only colindixion has +1'd (afaict)
18:17:37 <edwarnicke> colindixon: You are right, that is much easier on the eyes :)
18:17:49 <regXboi> +1 now
18:17:49 <aboch> I will update the table reflecting in the feature list the OF 1.0 plugin, the AD-SAL + clustering, and various AD-SAL based functioanl modules and their REST API are available.
18:17:52 <aboch> if no objections
18:18:11 <colindixon> aboch: that sounds good
18:18:17 <edwarnicke> aboch: Please make clear which features are new in this release
18:18:37 <edwarnicke> aboch: And which are pre-existing
18:18:41 <aboch> edwarnicke: this is the first release.
18:18:49 <edwarnicke> aboch: But thank you very much for doing the work :)
18:18:50 <aboch> I am not sure I understood
18:19:10 <edwarnicke> #info +1 controller release review
18:19:20 <regXboi> #info +1 controller release review
18:19:32 <edwarnicke> aboch: Folks are going to compare the features to the release plan... the only new AD-SAL feature in the release plan was packet filter, which was dropped
18:19:34 * colindixon already +1ed it a long while ago
18:19:49 <Madhu> aboch: thanks sir
18:20:09 <dmm> #info ok, hearing no objections to controller...
18:20:09 <dmm> #topic lispflowmapping release review
18:20:09 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Release_Review
18:20:17 <dmm> we're on lispflowmapping
18:20:25 <ermagan> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Release_Review
18:21:56 <dmm> ermagan: I've been trying to #link to the current review; did folks not see that?
18:22:05 <edwarnicke> #info +1 lispflowmapping release review
18:22:34 <ermagan> <dmm> yes. Sorry I did a repeat. I see the info on line to the lispflowmapping review
18:22:48 <dmm> ermagan: thnx/no worries
18:23:05 * colindixon wonders if we should be auditing project names here
18:23:10 <edwarnicke> #info we have complete the respin mentioned in the TSC to fix lispflowmapping and snmp4sdn NB API issue with jackson version:
18:23:16 <edwarnicke> #link https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/distributions-base/0.1.1/
18:23:24 <edwarnicke> #link https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/distributions-serviceprovider/0.1.1/
18:23:32 <edwarnicke> #link https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.release/org/opendaylight/integration/distributions-virtualization/0.1.1/
18:23:42 * regXboi says ed stop stuttering
18:23:49 <edwarnicke> LuisGomez has confirmed they past all CSIT tests
18:23:50 <colindixon> is there a lisp mapping developer guide?
18:23:58 <dmm> edwarnicke:s/complete/completed/ (?)
18:24:16 <edwarnicke> completed
18:24:25 <ermagan> <colindixon> not yet. it point to the developer installation and API sections
18:24:31 <ermagan> inside userguide for now
18:24:36 <colindixon> ok
18:24:39 <colindixon> that's fine, just asking
18:25:35 <colindixon> can we add a link to the bugzilla just for ease: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance%20desc&bug_status=__open__&product=lispflowmapping&list_id=3345
18:26:08 <colindixon> other than those nits, it looks good
18:26:10 <ermagan> <colindixon> sure, will do now.
18:26:19 <colindixon> #info +1 for lispflowmapping release review
18:28:13 <dmm> 2 minutes left on lispflowmapping...
18:30:02 <dmm> #info ok, (again) hearing no objections to lispflowmapping...
18:30:02 <dmm> #topic ovsdb integration release review
18:30:02 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OVSDB:Release_Review
18:30:16 <dmm> we're on ovsdb integration
18:30:29 <ermagan> #info Thanks team for lisp release review
18:30:39 <dmm> ermagan: thank you for the fine work
18:33:07 <colindixon> #info +1 for ovsdb release review
18:34:12 <networkstatic> hi, guys. we are still tidying but overall we are pseudo satusfactory. one cool note is we prolly got %20 of it written by community as opposed to the two of us
18:34:29 <dmm> networkstatic: cool
18:34:30 <regXboi> lucky you
18:34:39 <Madhu> oh ya. lucky us.
18:34:41 <edwarnicke> #info +1 ovsdb release review
18:35:03 <networkstatic> release ntoes will be tighteneed up this after also
18:35:08 <networkstatic> er ntoes
18:35:16 <networkstatic> sigh notes
18:35:25 <dmm> no "correct my spelling" bot?
18:35:30 <Madhu> networkstatic: goto bed.
18:35:30 <networkstatic> hehe
18:35:35 <networkstatic> u first :)
18:35:37 <regXboi> #info +1 ovsdb release review
18:38:25 <dmm> colindixion: are you opendove now?
18:38:40 <regXboi> I hope so
18:38:48 <networkstatic> thanks gents, appreciate the time and assistance
18:38:51 <colindixon> regXboi and I, yes
18:38:56 * regXboi genuflects to colindixon's typing speed
18:38:59 <dmm> thnx
18:39:14 * networkstatic bows to the ODL gods
18:39:16 <dmm> networkstatic: fine job by your team
18:39:22 <networkstatic> thanks boss
18:40:02 <dmm> #info hearing no objections to ovsdb integration...
18:40:02 <dmm> #topic opendove release review
18:40:02 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Open_DOVE:Hydrogen_Release_Review
18:40:08 <dmm> we're on opendove
18:40:21 * regXboi tells edwarnicke "cue the eagle's music"
18:40:48 <edwarnicke> Lol
18:40:51 <networkstatic> LOL
18:41:06 <regXboi> networkstatic: you don't know the half of it
18:41:15 <networkstatic> lolol
18:43:17 <colindixon> are regXboi and I allowed to vote :p
18:43:25 * regXboi listens to the crickets
18:43:47 <edwarnicke> #i of
18:44:00 <colindixon> edwarnicke: that's impressive
18:44:03 <regXboi> ok, I can't translate that
18:44:07 <edwarnicke> #info +1 open dove release review
18:44:59 <colindixon> the one note that I'll point out is that we've run into a non-technical issue with releasing the open dove gateway code which we think we can resolve
18:45:11 <colindixon> but not in time for the release on Tuesday morning
18:45:31 <cdub> plans to update intallation guide?
18:45:41 <regXboi> that and I just got sample rpms so I can update the install guide
18:45:49 <colindixon> regXboi: is working on that
18:45:50 <dmm> colindixon: can you expand on that?
18:46:05 <regXboi> colindixon: want me to?
18:46:15 <regXboi> since I've got the d**n scars
18:46:15 <regXboi> ?
18:46:39 <colindixon> regXboi: sure
18:46:52 <regXboi> so the problem is that the gateway consists of two parts
18:47:03 <regXboi> an EPL user agent which is in the code base
18:47:11 <colindixon> short version: we need to jump through a legal hoop to get permission to put out GPL code :-/
18:47:12 <regXboi> and a GPL kernel module which isn't
18:47:20 <regXboi> yep
18:47:39 <regXboi> and we have to try and jump through another legal hoop to package it as a VM to be user-friendly
18:48:16 <colindixon> cdub: yes, regXboi is working on the documentation today and this weekend
18:48:21 <cdub> while it's not ideal...is it part of our criteria for judging the release review?
18:48:21 <dmm> 2 mintues left on opendove
18:48:37 <LuisGomez> sorry to interrupt, all tests passed GOOD to new edtion release artifacts
18:48:45 <colindixon> LuisGomez: w00t
18:49:00 <regXboi> really? I saw messages that the rpm cut failed?
18:49:05 <dmm> LuisGomez: awesome
18:49:28 <LuisGomez> system test for the editions bundles i am talking
18:49:33 <regXboi> oh n/m then
18:49:43 <LuisGomez> rpms is Shague
18:49:45 <colindixon> cdub: I don't think that it is
18:50:25 <dmm> cdub/colindixon: I want to call opendove closed/good, any objections
18:50:51 <regXboi> I'll point out that there is enough info for someone to build and use opendove and start contributing to it
18:51:20 <dmm> ok
18:51:28 <dmm> #info and finally (hearing no objections to opendove)...
18:51:29 <dmm> #topic affinity release review
18:51:29 <dmm> #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Affinity_Metadata_Service:Release_Review
18:51:31 <colindixon> dmm: I'm happy to call it closes, but, really that's up to you, cdub, and edwarnicke
18:51:40 <dmm> we're on affinity
18:51:50 * regXboi thanks folks for their patience
18:52:02 <dmm> regXboi: thank you folks for the fine work
18:53:45 <networkstatic> thank u guys
18:53:55 * colindixon scans the page
18:53:56 <networkstatic> oops, not done
18:53:58 <networkstatic> lol
18:54:10 <dmm> networkstatic: I sense a trend
18:54:18 <cdub> #info +1 opendove
18:54:28 <dmm> cdub: thnx
18:54:28 <cdub> (sorry, got pulled aside here)
18:54:30 <edwarnicke> #info +1 affinity release review
18:54:40 <dmm> edwarnicke: thnx
18:54:41 <regXboi> #info +1 affinity release review
18:55:11 <dmm> regXboi: thnx
18:55:25 <colindixon> #info +1 to affinity
18:55:36 <cdub> #info +1 for affinity
18:55:56 <suchiraman> thank you
18:56:00 <cdub> (would be good to use bugzilla)
18:56:07 <suchiraman> we'll start doing that.
18:56:14 <cdub> thank you suchi
18:58:15 <dmm> 2 minutes left on affinity
18:58:52 <colindixon> dmm: thanks for running this
18:59:09 <dmm> colindixon: my pleasure
18:59:12 <regXboi> +1 to colindixon's comment
18:59:31 <dmm> thank you
19:00:03 <dmm> ok, so we didnt get defense4all done but everyone else, congrats and very nice workk all!
19:00:18 <dmm> maybe I should #info that
19:00:24 <regXboi> probably a good idea
19:00:25 <colindixon> "and there was much rejoicing"
19:00:33 <regXboi> hey, that's *my* line
19:00:33 <dmm> #info ok, so we didnt get defense4all done but everyone else, congrats and very nice workk all!
19:01:01 <dmm> onward and upward
19:01:30 <tykeal> dmm don't forget to #endmeeting when you're actually done with it ;)
19:01:45 <dmm> right; can you give a comment with #endmeeting?
19:01:57 <tykeal> dmm not that I'm aware of
19:02:00 <dmm> ok
19:02:01 <dmm> thnx
19:02:07 <tykeal> just stick a #info as the last thing ;)
19:02:20 <dmm> so I'm going to #endmeeting unless anyone objects
19:02:36 <dmm> (well, that's not recursively enumerable, but...)
19:05:08 <colindixon> dmm: go for it
19:05:51 <dmm> #info projects passing Hydrogen release review: vtn, snmp4sdn, openflow plugin, openflow protocol library,controller,lispflowmapping service, yang tools,ovsdb integration, opendove, affinity, and  bgp-ls/pcep
19:06:07 <dmm> #info not reviewed: Defense4All
19:06:13 <dmm> #endmeeting