18:01:26 #startmeeting OpenDaylight TSC Meeting 18:01:26 Meeting started Thu Feb 20 18:01:26 2014 UTC. The chair is phrobb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:01:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:01:33 that's the link 18:01:58 thanks 18:02:19 #info dmm 18:02:21 TSC members please pound info in for the roll call 18:03:21 #info vijoy 18:04:17 #info Chris Wright 18:04:49 #info Rob Dolin, proxy for Rajeev Nagar (Microsoft) 18:06:06 #topic Acceptance of Minutes 18:06:47 #people have not reviewed minutes 18:07:37 #info people have not reviewed the minutes, plan is to push them as drafts and then approve them formally later 18:08:18 #info note that janmedved is here on behalf of edwarnicke_ 18:09:30 where is the link to the hackathon? 18:09:36 I can't seem to find it 18:09:38 anyone have it? 18:09:48 @mestery -- standby 18:09:54 thanks dmm 18:10:00 we need to put hackathon info right on the front page of opendaylight.org 18:10:09 people aren't going to grovel through the site to find that stuff 18:10:28 maybe can work on that (please)? 18:10:29 agreed tnadeau 18:10:37 #info Hackfest details are here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/HackFestAgenda#HackFest_Agenda:_March_26th_-_28th 18:11:11 thanks RobDolin! 18:11:25 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/HackFestAgenda#HackFest_Agenda:_March_26th_-_28th (a clickable version of the hackfest link) 18:11:29 please avoid the fall IETF (its in Hawaii) https://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html 18:11:53 tnadeau: I take it you mean avoid scheduling over, rather than just avoid :p 18:11:54 will do 18:12:22 #topic Creation Review DPDK_vSwitch 18:14:43 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:OpenDayLight_Intel%C2%AE_DPDK_vSwitch Uri (Intel) is presenting on DPDK vSwitch proposal 18:16:48 #info dmm asks "how ready" the project is to move to incubation? 18:16:59 folks not talking please mute - there is a horrible echo 18:17:08 vijoy: I think it's just uri's phone 18:17:17 I don't see anyone else talking :-( 18:17:52 colindixon, yep that is what I am seeing also 18:19:45 #info team does not know that a new project is needed. The team will first see if working with existing projects is sufficient 18:23:01 #info the DPDK vSwitch team will do deeper eval of work needed and impact on existing projects. They will then come back and see if a new project is warranted, or if they could fit within the existing projects. 18:24:52 does their proposal have a name? 18:27:15 tnadeau: #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:OpenDayLight_Intel%C2%AE_DPDK_vSwitch 18:27:34 To be honest, I think this a pretty good idea. In general, I think that the right approach is spawn new projects when we need them. 18:28:32 #topic Helium Release Planning and the Fall Summit 18:29:19 #info vote on shall the next release of OpenDaylight be named "Helium"? 18:29:20 aye (like a pirate) 18:29:34 aye 18:29:36 #agreed The name of the second release is "Helium" 18:29:44 Yay for Helium! 18:30:17 thats a good motif 18:30:20 DMM suggests: Major releases as elements; minor releases as isotopes. 18:30:52 Post a roadmap of release names? 18:31:27 H.1 H.2, H.3,... He.1, He.2, He.3, ... ? 18:31:46 #info there is a discussion about whether we should name the sub-releases as isotopes of the element of the main release, e.g., deuterium, tritium, etc. 18:31:57 #info discussion ensued on minor release naming… 18:31:57 #info others propose simple numbering for minor releases 18:32:18 * colindixon abdicates his #info throne to phrobb :p 18:32:46 no no no colindixon, please continue to help out 18:33:17 H (or H.0) was released at the OpenDaylight Summit, H.1 will be next minor release, He (or He.0) will be next major release ? 18:34:17 minor suggestion on release naming ? 18:34:30 hydrogen.r1, etc is more intuitive than hydrogen.1 etc 18:34:36 #agreed as project goes along, major releases as elements, minor releases numbered 18:35:02 #info who maintains the branches and how does it get done? 18:35:10 definitely too much for one person 18:35:16 #info the work is too much for one person 18:36:00 wrangler -> cat herder 18:36:46 #info a release engineer can manage the overall mechanics, but each project needs to manage the creation and evolution of stable branches within their projects 18:37:24 #info it is noted that we need a bug-fix release soon. What are the concrete steps? 18:40:06 #action janmedved agreed to work with cdub on creating a stable release branch for minor releases 18:47:30 #topic Helium planning and the Summit 18:48:54 #action phrobb will take the discussion for actual dates to the list 18:49:04 #topic At-Large TSC Elections 18:49:38 #info dmm had sent a mail proposing 2 at large TSC members to the TSC list 18:50:07 #info, response from the list agreed that two members were a good number 18:50:33 #info dmm asks how will nominations be done 18:50:37 I'd say people can just nominate people (or be nominated) 18:50:45 no need for a committee if you ask me 18:51:10 gaming: committees are gamed. its more transparent if people do it 18:51:28 #info discussion ensued on various methods for nomination 18:54:34 #info several members are in favor of changing charter to allow all contributors to the project to be allowed to run and vote for at large TSC positions 18:55:53 #action cdub to build a proposal for charter-change for TSC review for next week's TSC meeting. 18:57:37 #topic DLUX request to change the project license to Apache or dual licensed as Apache/EPL; Is there technical merit in that activity the TSC would agree to? 18:58:34 #info question from cdub - does the DLUX team see a code-flow moving at the pace of Horizon - or is there other motivation 18:59:39 #info DLUX team noted that code created to augment horizon code can't be contributed back, so it is difficult stay in sync with horizon project 19:03:35 either the call is done or webex is having issues again. audio line just disconnected me 19:03:49 @tom - Call is still going. 19:07:49 #info several TSC members would like to understand technical options of using Horizon while not changing the license of the DLUX project 19:15:11 #agreed TSC requests DLUX team to provide more detail on what they want to do, the various options on how to do it, and the cost/benefit technically of each - creating a wiki page to cover these topics, and the technical implications 19:17:01 #topic Collaboration Tools 19:17:48 #info topic deferred until next week 19:18:10 #topic INCNTRE engagment update 19:19:49 #info dmm provided update on activities thus fare with trying to work with INCNTRE to date. 19:20:25 #info this effort is currently "stuck" due to NDA requirement. 19:23:05 #topic Branding 19:23:21 #action phrobb to get branding discussions going again 19:24:59 #topic Possible renaming of Application Policy project to avoid confusion between OpenDaylight and OpenStack projects 19:25:46 #info need to understand tech/logistic issues of changing repo, mailing lists, etc. 19:29:08 #info several TSC members expressed desire to not oversee naming of projects unless there is some kind of onforeseen issue 19:29:54 #agreed TSC does not need to intervene on this topic at this time 19:30:18 #endmeeting