#opendaylight-meeting: lithium release review

Meeting started by phrobb at 14:30:01 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. roll call (phrobb, 14:30:10)
    1. Project Leaders and TSC members please #info in (phrobb, 14:30:22)
    2. Prem_ for VPNService (Prem_, 14:30:45)
    3. LuisGomez (LuisGomez, 14:30:57)
    4. gzhao (gzhao, 14:30:59)

  2. VPN Service (phrobb, 14:32:01)
    1. Prem_ is representing VPN Service (gzhao, 14:32:59)
    2. LuisGomez asks if the test failure in csit is expected (gzhao, 14:36:33)
    3. ACTION: Prem_ to document known work-arounds for listed bugs in release notes (phrobb, 14:38:03)
    4. phrobb asks if security feature really n/a, Prem_ says they are not leveraging any security features. (gzhao, 14:38:06)
    5. Prem_ says manually the test works (gzhao, 14:40:12)
    6. Prem_ notes they are still investigating csit failure (phrobb, 14:40:38)

  3. SNMP4SDN (phrobb, 14:41:16)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:Lithium_Release_Review (phrobb, 14:42:04)

  4. SNMP4SDN (gzhao, 14:44:34)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:Lithium_Release_Note (ChristineH, 14:44:41)
    2. ChristineH is reprenting SNMP4SDN (gzhao, 14:45:54)
    3. ChristineH are there any migration concerns for users moving from Helium to Lithium regarding SNMP4SDN? (phrobb, 14:46:32)
    4. ChristineH notes that for developer, the API is changed. for user, I think it's more convenient for them to use snmp4sdn via REST AP (phrobb, 14:48:24)
    5. Vina Ermagan for LISP Flow Mapping (vina_ermagan, 14:50:46)

  5. LISP (gzhao, 14:51:02)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Lithium_Release_Review (vina_ermagan, 14:51:05)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Lithium_Release_Notes (vina_ermagan, 14:51:17)
    3. vina_ermagan Can you describe the migration issues for users moving from Helium to Lithium? (phrobb, 14:54:06)
    4. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KPpO9LH539Vlcoa4RvLa6PPCdLifi5JD-ihRhlybqeo/edit#gid=478292312 Link to voting page (phrobb, 14:55:07)
    5. LISP Flow Mapping is Go on Li (vina_ermagan, 14:55:53)
    6. vina_ermagan Notes that the only migration issue is transition to RPCs from original northbound apis and the release notes call out where the new interfaces are documents (phrobb, 14:57:41)

  6. ALTO (phrobb, 15:00:43)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ALTO:Lithium:Release_Review (__Kai__, 15:01:00)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ALTO:Lithium:Release_Notes (__Kai__, 15:01:19)

  7. ALTO (gzhao, 15:03:53)
    1. ebrjohn for Service Function Chaining (ebrjohn, 15:05:56)
    2. phrobb asks No Security considerations? Could you use AAA and chose not to this release or did it not make sense to use it ever?... as an example (phrobb, 15:07:06)
    3. dongshu notes We could use AAA to protect sensitive info or customized info, but choose to not, for simplicity. (phrobb, 15:07:34)
    4. ACTION: dongshu to security concern to release review (gzhao, 15:07:44)
    5. ACTION: dongshu to update release review wiki re security consideration (phrobb, 15:07:59)
    6. ACTION: dongshu __Kai__ to remove non-outstanding bugs from release review (gzhao, 15:12:31)

  8. SFC (phrobb, 15:12:57)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Lithium_Release_Review#Standards_.28summary_of_standard_compliance.29 (ebrjohn, 15:13:39)
    2. ebrjohn for SFC (gzhao, 15:13:46)
    3. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Lithium_Release_Review (ebrjohn, 15:14:13)
    4. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Lithium_Release_Notes (ebrjohn, 15:14:30)
    5. ebrjohn for SFC (ebrjohn, 15:16:52)
    6. ebrjohn says 3825 was a blocker, but its been fixed (gzhao, 15:19:32)

  9. odlparent (phrobb, 15:21:55)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL_Root_Parent:Lithium_Release_Review (Vaishali, 15:22:03)
    2. Vaishali representing odlparent (phrobb, 15:22:10)
    3. phrobb asks are there any user or developer facing issues that may be encountered as they migrate from Helium to Lithium? (phrobb, 15:25:30)
    4. Vaishali Notes that thre shoiuld not be any migration issues (phrobb, 15:25:48)

  10. reservation (phrobb, 15:26:42)
    1. mlemay for reservation project (phrobb, 15:27:14)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Reservation:Lithium_Release_Review (mlemay, 15:27:42)
    3. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Reservation:Lithium_Release_Notes (mlemay, 15:27:58)
    4. phrobb asks if Java 8 is required, mlemay responds no it is not and he will make that more clear in the release notes (phrobb, 15:31:38)
    5. ACTION: mlemay to clarify Java 7/8 requirements in release notes (phrobb, 15:31:59)
    6. phrobb says there is no problem putting such a statement in your relese notes such as flag things as "experimental" this release"? (gzhao, 15:38:33)
    7. mlemay notes no outstanding bugs found since there are not much testing on reservation (gzhao, 15:41:44)
    8. phrobb strongly suggests putting some kind of warning in the release notes that this is Experimental/beta/tech-preview etc (gzhao, 15:42:31)

  11. gbp (phrobb, 15:46:19)
    1. Release Review: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Group_Based_Policy_(GBP)/Releases/Lithium/Release_Review (alagalah, 15:46:43)
    2. Release Notes: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Group_Based_Policy_(GBP)/Releases/Lithium/Release_Notes (alagalah, 15:46:58)
    3. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KPpO9LH539Vlcoa4RvLa6PPCdLifi5JD-ihRhlybqeo/edit#gid=478292312 (phrobb, 15:58:43)
    4. alagalah notes technically more correct to say SFC is part of the renderer, not the core model and policy resolution process. (gzhao, 15:58:49)
    5. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Persistence:Lithium:Release_Review (Shreyas, 16:02:28)

  12. Persistence (phrobb, 16:02:29)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Persistence:Lithium:Release_Review (Shreyas, 16:02:43)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Persistence:Lithium_Release_Notes (Shreyas, 16:02:48)
    3. LuisGomez asks there is no bugs and limitations? (gzhao, 16:05:13)
    4. Shreyas notest that This is the first release for Persistence; as other modules will start using it now, we might have bugs coming in (phrobb, 16:05:56)
    5. ACTION: Shreyas to link the unit test coverage in release review (phrobb, 16:06:27)
    6. ACTION: Shreyas to add "known Limitations" section to release notes calling out Persistence works only for in-memory databases (phrobb, 16:07:58)
    7. LuisGomez asks so this is kind of experimental/beta code this release? (phrobb, 16:08:53)
    8. ACTION: Shreyas to update relesase notes to call out that this release of Persistence is experimental/beta code (phrobb, 16:09:42)

  13. NIC (phrobb, 16:11:41)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Reservation:Lithium_Release_Review (dbainbri, 16:12:11)
    2. dbainbri for NIC (phrobb, 16:12:12)
    3. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Network_Intent_Composition:Lithium_Release_Notes (dbainbri, 16:12:20)
    4. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Network_Intent_Composition:Lithium_Release_Review (dbainbri, 16:13:39)
    5. ACTION: dbainbri to remove N/A second and add a notice to indicate this project in Lithium is experimental (gzhao, 16:21:27)
    6. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KPpO9LH539Vlcoa4RvLa6PPCdLifi5JD-ihRhlybqeo/edit#gid=478292312 (phrobb, 16:22:30)

  14. AAA (phrobb, 16:23:27)
  15. TSDR (phrobb, 16:25:18)
    1. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSDR:Lithium:Release_Review (YuLing_, 16:25:49)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSDR:Lithium:Release_Notes (YuLing_, 16:25:57)
    3. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-1node/job/tsdr-csit-1node-cds-hbase-datastore-only-stable-lithium/ (LuisGomez, 16:28:41)

  16. DIDM (phrobb, 16:33:00)
    1. Gunjan for DIDM (Gunjan, 16:33:06)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/DIDM:_Lithium_Release_Review (Gunjan, 16:33:19)
    3. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/DIDM:_Lithium_Release_Notes (Gunjan, 16:33:26)
    4. LuisGomez notes that DIDM indicates they are beta quality in their Release Notes (phrobb, 16:36:17)
    5. gzhao asks is didm java 8 compatible? (phrobb, 16:36:46)
    6. Gunjan replies we haven't tested it with java 8, is that something we should have done? (phrobb, 16:37:12)
    7. ACTION: LuisGomez and phrobb to work with TSC to add experimental tag for such projects in Be and beyond (phrobb, 16:39:19)

  17. PCMM (phrobb, 16:42:00)
    1. kkershaw for PCMM (kkershaw, 16:42:10)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/PacketCablePCMM:LithiumReleaseReview (kkershaw, 16:42:25)
    3. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/PacketCablePCMM:LithiumReleaseNotes (kkershaw, 16:42:45)
    4. LuisGomez asks are there any migration concern helium-lithium? (phrobb, 16:46:09)
    5. kkershaw responds APIs were non-functional in helium Also, we know of no users. Lithium APIs are clean and operational (phrobb, 16:46:43)
    6. kkershaw notes no backwards compatible for pcmm (gzhao, 16:48:08)
    7. kkershaw notes lithium code is well tested. (gzhao, 16:50:04)
    8. kkershaw and mlemay note bugs are mainly from older release and will be deprecated (gzhao, 16:51:36)

  18. COOKIES (phrobb, 16:54:57)


Meeting ended at 16:56:19 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. Prem_ to document known work-arounds for listed bugs in release notes
  2. dongshu to security concern to release review
  3. dongshu to update release review wiki re security consideration
  4. dongshu __Kai__ to remove non-outstanding bugs from release review
  5. mlemay to clarify Java 7/8 requirements in release notes
  6. Shreyas to link the unit test coverage in release review
  7. Shreyas to add "known Limitations" section to release notes calling out Persistence works only for in-memory databases
  8. Shreyas to update relesase notes to call out that this release of Persistence is experimental/beta code
  9. dbainbri to remove N/A second and add a notice to indicate this project in Lithium is experimental
  10. LuisGomez and phrobb to work with TSC to add experimental tag for such projects in Be and beyond


Action items, by person

  1. __Kai__
    1. dongshu __Kai__ to remove non-outstanding bugs from release review
  2. dbainbri
    1. dbainbri to remove N/A second and add a notice to indicate this project in Lithium is experimental
  3. dongshu
    1. dongshu to security concern to release review
    2. dongshu to update release review wiki re security consideration
    3. dongshu __Kai__ to remove non-outstanding bugs from release review
  4. LuisGomez
    1. LuisGomez and phrobb to work with TSC to add experimental tag for such projects in Be and beyond
  5. mlemay
    1. mlemay to clarify Java 7/8 requirements in release notes
  6. phrobb
    1. LuisGomez and phrobb to work with TSC to add experimental tag for such projects in Be and beyond
  7. Prem_
    1. Prem_ to document known work-arounds for listed bugs in release notes
  8. Shreyas
    1. Shreyas to link the unit test coverage in release review
    2. Shreyas to add "known Limitations" section to release notes calling out Persistence works only for in-memory databases
    3. Shreyas to update relesase notes to call out that this release of Persistence is experimental/beta code


People present (lines said)

  1. phrobb (186)
  2. gzhao (105)
  3. LuisGomez (55)
  4. mlemay (36)
  5. alagalah (32)
  6. ebrjohn (24)
  7. dbainbri (22)
  8. YuLing_ (20)
  9. kkershaw (14)
  10. vina_ermagan (14)
  11. Prem_ (14)
  12. Shreyas (12)
  13. dongshu (10)
  14. odl_meetbot (10)
  15. Gunjan (9)
  16. __Kai__ (8)
  17. ChristineH (8)
  18. Vaishali (8)
  19. vishnoianil (3)
  20. vthapar (1)
  21. zxiiro (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.