18:00:45 #startmeeting tsc 18:00:45 Meeting started Thu Dec 3 18:00:45 2015 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 18:00:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:45 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 18:00:53 #topic roll call and agenda bashing 18:00:59 TSC members please #info in 18:00:59 #info edwarnicke 18:01:01 #info colindixon 18:01:03 #info Daniel Farrell 18:01:12 * edwarnicke will be a little late on audio 18:01:18 #chair phrobb dfarrell07 anipbu 18:01:18 Current chairs: anipbu colindixon dfarrell07 phrobb 18:01:30 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=38891#Agenda the agenda in it's usual place 18:01:42 #ink https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2015/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2015-11-19-18.00.html last week's meeting minutes are here 18:02:11 zxiiro: do you know if phrobb is around? 18:02:34 #info Chris Price 18:03:05 colindixon: I do not 18:03:13 #info mohnish anumala 18:04:05 #action colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade to Beryllium? 18:05:29 #action zxiiro to open a bug against releng/builder about figuring out a process to get feature-level code coverage 18:05:38 #action rovarga, alagalah, mohnish, ttkacik, vishnoianil, ebrjohn, RPenno, abhijitkumbhare will try to draft a paragraph around the best practices including this discussion and feedback (to be gotten) from PTLS, they should also feel free to provide feedback around tools and technical solutions to help with upstream/downstream breakages 18:05:48 #action LuisGomez to give an estimate for a drop-dead date on when we'd need to decide if we actually need a stable distribution 18:06:23 edwarnicke: do you know anything about the above 18:06:25 #action phrobb to poll the PTLs about hackfest attendance 18:06:53 #action jamoluhrsen to figure out how to start doing testing with JDK8 18:08:10 #info edwarnicke says his gut is that we're past the drop-dead date for having a stable distribution 18:09:23 #action colindixon to start a discussion if we could have a stable release in Beryllum noting that it might not be possible 18:09:35 * ChrisPriceAB has to drop off at the top of the hour... 18:09:45 yay thanks 18:09:56 edwarnicke: +1, I do not think it's doable in this release 18:10:01 #topic events 18:10:12 #link https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events the events page 18:10:44 #info OpenDaylight user group, Stockholm chapter had an inaugural meet-up last night. 18:11:10 #Info phrobb says the current plan is have a design forum for boron in the first week of march in the bay area 18:11:58 2/29 or first full week of March? 18:12:46 #Info ChrisPriceAB said one of the topics at the Stockholm ODLUG was the hard ramp up for ODL, there was the idea of doing a boot camp in Europe, akin to the application tutorial that was done at the OpenDaylight summit 18:15:22 #action colindixon to send a mail with some ideas about running tutorials with new known knows 18:15:55 #info ChrisPriceAB sasy that SDN Hub OpenDaylight tutorials were referenced a lot, but maybe not idea for us 18:16:42 #action phrobb and/or gzhao to work with ChrisPriceAB to figure when/where/who would run a Europe boot camp 18:17:34 ack 18:18:45 #topic beryllium 18:19:04 #info today is M5 for offset 0 and M4 for offset 2 18:19:11 * zxiiro will be creating pre-boron branches today 18:19:34 #info autrelease was broken by SNBI, fixed, but is now broken by OVSDB but it's been looked it 18:19:49 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#Current_Weather_Report the weather upcoming 18:20:03 #Info there are some thigns coming up, please go look at them 18:20:23 #Info the big one that's coming is removing AD-SAL 18:20:51 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Kfp5HVQGydNegEjp6dD2V3XsUnqpice0bysWbdxABA4/edit#gid=1862710416 the beryllium status 18:21:10 #info zxiiro says he's going to be creating per-boron branches today 18:22:24 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2015-November/004645.html pre-boron branch cutting 18:22:34 #topic stable/lithium 18:22:40 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ktL11ElNdf4D3RUeRNUd8SPnYO0to0DxzSZGst0KdMQ/edit#gid=1055423260 18:22:59 #info it looks like Lithium-SR3 is ready to go (the above sheet shows every issue signed off by the relevant project) 18:23:37 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Lithium_Release_Plan#Lithium_SR3_Download 18:23:57 #startvote shall the TSC bless teh SR3 artifacts as describe above? -1, 0, +1 18:23:57 Begin voting on: shall the TSC bless teh SR3 artifacts as describe above? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:23:57 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:24:07 #vote +1 18:24:08 #vote +1 18:24:08 #vote +1 18:24:10 #vote +1 18:24:11 #vote +1 18:24:12 #vote +1 18:24:27 #endvote 18:24:27 Voted on "shall the TSC bless teh SR3 artifacts as describe above?" Results are 18:24:27 +1 (6): dfarrell07, uri, ChrisPriceAB, edwarnicke, colindixon, mohnish_ 18:24:39 #agree we will promote the staging repo and release Lithium-SR3 18:25:14 #topic infrastructure 18:25:41 #info rackspace has provided us the new private cloud, we're still working on getting the VPN link up and working, then we'll start kicking the tires, and start moving into it in the next month or so 18:26:11 Sorry I'm late. Internet has been down for the last 2 hours. :( 18:26:15 o.o 18:26:46 tykeal: So no CI on Raspberry Pi? ;) 18:26:47 #info colindixon asks if this would enable us to install our own hardware in the infrastructure, tykeal says no, it has to be rackspace-offered hardware 18:27:05 need to move to a high tech state odl-casey... 18:27:32 I have 1GB fiber internet. It should be "high tech". 18:27:43 odl-casey: Andrew McLachlan was asking about revamping the wiki, I told him to check out the TWS call 18:28:31 #topic kafka producer creation review 18:28:38 #info andrew will post slides after the call 18:28:46 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Kafkaproducer project proposal 18:29:03 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2015-November/000377.html proposed on 11/16/2015 18:29:44 #action colindixon to add instructions to upload materials before creation reviews to the proposal instructions 18:30:10 #info andrew says that this is something they've already built for another thing, but there was enough interest that they thought they would bring it here 18:30:30 #info it's a way to push ODL data to a Kafka cluster 18:30:59 #info supports compression (gzip and snappy now), supports codec types (raw and avro now), supports sycn and async 18:31:19 #Info currently pulls data from the event topic broker, but going forward could pull data from other places in ODL 18:31:57 #Info right now there are two things that publish to the Event Topic Broker: NETCONF connector and a hweventsource for other things 18:32:09 #info right now it works with stable/lithium, but obviously would roll forward on joining 18:32:59 #info have working code, willing committers, looking to update, looking for new ideas and/or suggestions 18:33:23 #info abhijitkumbhare asks what the relationship between this Kafka cluster and Akka cluster 18:34:13 #info andrew answers no relationship now 18:35:03 #info colindixon asks what Kafka is, Willis says that it's a scale-out messaging system, designed to do very high throughput messaing in a pub-sub, reliable system 18:36:57 #info basically this is a way to get data/events out of ODL to an off-the-shelf, popular, easy-to-install message bus 18:37:26 #Info Willis says that one reason Kafka is more interesting than RabbitMQ or others is because it's able to elastically scale-out 18:37:56 #info mohnish_ asks what data they're looking to expose, andrew answers mostly telemetry from southbound devices for now 18:39:26 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Messaging4Transport:Main colindixon asks what the relationsihp is between this and the messaging4transport project which seemingly does this with AMQP 18:40:32 #info andrew says his impression was that M4T was more of a message bus and had more stuf in the controller, this las less stuff 18:42:13 #Info edwarnicke says his take is that M4T is trying to do things for *all* the messages/events in the MD-SAL vs. this which is looking to just do it for specific things, e.g,, event topic broker 18:43:57 #action Andrew M. to get with Phil Robb to perform Inbound Code Review on initial code to be contributed 18:44:08 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Kafkaproducer#Scope 18:45:13 #Info colindixon says the first paragaph of the description reads like the scope 18:46:30 #action Andrew McLachlan to add presented slides and initial committers to the wiki proposal page: <= https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Kafka_Transport 18:46:50 * phrobb_ thanks edwarnicke for saying what he actually intended 18:46:59 #startvote shall the TSC move the kafkaproducer project to incubation? -1, 0, +1 18:46:59 Begin voting on: shall the TSC move the kafkaproducer project to incubation? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:46:59 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:47:02 phrobb_: I live to serve ;) 18:47:25 #vote +1 18:47:36 #vote +1 18:47:46 #vote +1 18:47:53 #vote +1 18:48:15 * ChrisPriceAB is still waiting on the page to refresh... 18:48:44 #info andrew says the plan is to possibly expand beyond just the event topic broker in the future 18:49:00 uri: edwarnicke 18:49:00 #vote +1 18:49:12 #vote +1 18:49:24 uri: can you vote? 18:49:26 #vote +1 18:49:30 #endvote 18:49:30 Voted on "shall the TSC move the kafkaproducer project to incubation?" Results are 18:49:30 +1 (6): dfarrell07, uri, ChrisPriceAB, edwarnicke, colindixon, mohnish_ 18:49:46 #agree the kafkaproducer project will be moved to incubation after incoming code review 18:49:54 congrats 18:50:14 #topic TSC make up and elections 18:50:46 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-October/004026.html 18:51:04 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-November/004101.html 18:51:16 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-December/004298.html 18:51:42 #info the above three links are the thread about how to change the TSC make up and eleections across three months 18:52:06 #info dfarrell07 says this started to avoid the waiver enabling platinum designates to sit even if another person from their compnay was election 18:52:08 #undo 18:52:08 Removing item from minutes: 18:52:10 #info dfarrell07 says this started to avoid the waiver enabling platinum designates to sit even if another person from their compnay was elected 18:52:28 #info most proposals seem to do this by eleminating platinum designates 18:53:10 #info dfarrell07 says he thinks of this as having a list of represented groups, then you do STV (single transferrable votes) elections per group 18:53:41 #info groups serve two purposes: one to balance different views within opendaylight, and to provide incentives for projets to do things like move to mature 18:54:29 #info there are discussion about what the represented groups should be, e.g,, just one big group, lifecycle state, project type (kernel, apps, protocol), etc. 18:55:11 #info there's also a question of if we want to limit the number of elected people from a single company 18:58:22 #info colindixon asks if there is anyone that objects to removing platinum designates 18:58:36 #info uri says yes, as long as that's coupled with projects moving thorugh the maturity states 19:00:31 * ChrisPriceAB had to drop 19:01:01 That is correct. We will change the bylaws to remove that as a benefit of platinum members 19:01:37 #info colindixon says he thinks there are three or four main decisions points: (i) will we eliminate platinum designates, (ii) do we want to have both project leads and committers at large on the TSC, (iii) do we want to have per-company cap on representatives, (iv) do we want to do this now or in a year 19:03:16 #undo 19:03:16 Removing item from minutes: 19:03:57 #info colindixon says he thinks there are three or four main decisions points: (i) do we want to have per-company cap on representatives (ii) do we want to have both project leads and committers at large on the TSC, (iii) will we eliminate platinum designates,, (iv) do we want to do this now or in a year 19:04:17 #info dfarrell07 just suggested compiling governance 19:04:20 ;) 19:04:41 #action dfarrell07 to try to drive this to a vote 19:06:16 #info edwarnicke points out that per-company caps need to have a clear mechanism if we adopt them, colindixon says there have been some proposals for that on th elist 19:06:34 #info mohnish_ suggested we also look at how the transition will work 19:06:34 #info mohnish_ asks if there's a plan for a transition, and or discussion of the size 19:07:04 #info colindixon says the transition would likely be aided by people showing up and continuing to speak their minds even if votes transition quickly 19:07:13 #info I think the thread suggeted sizes of ~8-15 members 19:07:46 #topic cookies 19:07:46 Wait 19:08:19 odl-casey: link? 19:08:47 #lnk https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering you can change you them to the strapping them if you want on per-user base 19:08:56 #info that's from odl-casey 19:09:08 #endmeeting